2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-021-01280-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and structures of urea-formaldehyde resins prepared with different formaldehyde solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we consider only a pure urea as a source of amino groups, then after adding the modifier-curing agent to the resin, the molar ratio F/U shifts downward. In [32][33][34][35], the resin synthesis showed that a decrease in the molar ratio leads to an increase in the number of methylene bridges in UF oligomers, and this pattern is true for reactions in both alkaline and acidic environments. It is noteworthy that mostly increase amount just methylene bridges type I, that is in reactions involved mainly the terminal methylol groups.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If we consider only a pure urea as a source of amino groups, then after adding the modifier-curing agent to the resin, the molar ratio F/U shifts downward. In [32][33][34][35], the resin synthesis showed that a decrease in the molar ratio leads to an increase in the number of methylene bridges in UF oligomers, and this pattern is true for reactions in both alkaline and acidic environments. It is noteworthy that mostly increase amount just methylene bridges type I, that is in reactions involved mainly the terminal methylol groups.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Typically, the average fracture energy for mode I fracture in commercial syntheticurea formaldehyde adhesives falls within the range of 0.1 to 0.2 N/mm. For mode II fracture, this value extends between 0.2 to 0.4 N/mm [34,35]. In contrast, the bio-based adhesive showcased substantially elevated fracture energy values when compared to these conventional synthetic-urea-formaldehyde adhesives indicating its potential to enhance the durability and dependability of wooden products.…”
Section: Fracture Testsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, the crosslinking modification mechanism of UF for tannin adhesives was explored by taking resorcinol as a tannin A ring model compound [34][35][36][37] and dimethylol urea as a UF model compound from the perspective of the reaction of such model compounds. At present, most scholars believe that the copolycondensation reaction exists in the alkaline stage [38][39][40][41][42], and the research direction mostly focuses on the influence on the final resin properties, while the co-polycondensation reaction conditions have been investigated less. Co-polycondensation structures remain ambiguous, and the co-polycondensation conditions and mechanism have not been clearly described [43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%