1999 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 37th Annual (Cat. No.99CH36296)
DOI: 10.1109/relphy.1999.761610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and reliability of a new MEMS electrostatic lateral output motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 16 (Patton et al 1999(Patton et al , 2000Smallwood et al 2006) is one of the typical devices fabricated with the Multi-User MEMS Process (MUMPs). This structure is mainly actuated by a lateral micromotor.…”
Section: Line-line Contact Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 16 (Patton et al 1999(Patton et al , 2000Smallwood et al 2006) is one of the typical devices fabricated with the Multi-User MEMS Process (MUMPs). This structure is mainly actuated by a lateral micromotor.…”
Section: Line-line Contact Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrostatic cantilever motor is driven by applying a voltage across the cantilever and the underlying conductive substrate. Patton et al (1999) studied the failure mechanism of this device at various RH (relative humidity). They found that both the electrical and tribological performance of the motor depended on RH.…”
Section: Line-line Contact Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that humidity is a strong factor in the wear of rubbing surfaces in polysilicon microfabrication. The operation of MEMS in a very low humidity environment can lead to much greater amounts of wear debris than operation at higher humidity [56], [57]. As wear debris agglomerates, third body wear can be initiated which is often evidenced by scratches on surface.…”
Section: Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to continuing movement of these surfaces, fracture tends to occur away from the bonded interface leading to augmented asperities and wear debris, although no evidence of these processes was presented. Another study on wear in (dry) air [40][41][42] suggested that as the surface oxide layer wears, it regenerates resulting only in the wear of silicon dioxide. Finally, a recent study on micronscale polycrystalline silicon [43] showed clear evidence of abrasive wear particles of amorphous SiO 2 after long sliding times; the smoothness of the majority of these particles was attributed to a polishing effect that occurred after the particles were initially created.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%