2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1127-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and health of Holstein calves fed different levels of milk fortified with symbiotic complex containing pre- and probiotics

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and health of Holstein calves fed low or high milk supply (MSP) with or without symbiotic complex (SYM) supplementation, consisting of prebiotics, probiotics, and fibrolytic enzymes. Thirty-two Holstein calves with body weight (BW) of 34 ± 7 kg were distributed in a randomized block design in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of low and high MSP: 10 % of BW from 1st to 8th weeks after birth (low) and 20 % BW from 1st and 2nd weeks af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be noted when The low performance observed for 8 to 30 d calves could be associated with specific digestive patterns of MR, such as its relatively fast passage rate through the gastrointestinal tract and due to the low ability of the gut of young calves to digest non-milk components, considering the limited pancreatic enzyme production (Tanan, 2005). The scenario could be confirmed by our diarrhea events for calves 8 to 15 d old, which is typical in that period (Marcondes et al, 2016). Also, comparing WM and MR responses in gastrointestinal tract, the milk, even as a liquid feed, is high in casein (low concentration component in MR protein), allowing milk coagulation in the abomasum by rennin, or chymosin and chloric acid, forming a fat and protein clot compound (Pond et al, 2005).…”
Section: Adg and Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This should be noted when The low performance observed for 8 to 30 d calves could be associated with specific digestive patterns of MR, such as its relatively fast passage rate through the gastrointestinal tract and due to the low ability of the gut of young calves to digest non-milk components, considering the limited pancreatic enzyme production (Tanan, 2005). The scenario could be confirmed by our diarrhea events for calves 8 to 15 d old, which is typical in that period (Marcondes et al, 2016). Also, comparing WM and MR responses in gastrointestinal tract, the milk, even as a liquid feed, is high in casein (low concentration component in MR protein), allowing milk coagulation in the abomasum by rennin, or chymosin and chloric acid, forming a fat and protein clot compound (Pond et al, 2005).…”
Section: Adg and Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Scores 1 and 2 were considered normal. Diarrhea was defined as the presence of grade 3 or 4 feces for 2 consecutive days (Marcondes et al, 2016). The incidence of diarrhea in each group was calculated using the following formula:…”
Section: Analysis Of Growth Performance and The Incidence Of Diarrheamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies in this analysis, Miller-Cushon et al (2013a and2013b) and Overvest et al (2016) used a textured starter feed. Conversely, Jolomba (2015), Silva et al (2015), Marcondes et al (2016), Rodrigues et al (2016) and Dias et al (2017) used ground (as meal form) starter feed. Forage was not provided to calves, during the liquid feeding phase, in the studies of Miller-Cushon et al (2013a), Jolomba (2015), Silva et al (2015), Marcondes et al (2016), Rodrigues et al (2016) and Dias et al (2017).…”
Section: Development Of Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, Jolomba (2015), Silva et al (2015), Marcondes et al (2016), Rodrigues et al (2016) and Dias et al (2017) used ground (as meal form) starter feed. Forage was not provided to calves, during the liquid feeding phase, in the studies of Miller-Cushon et al (2013a), Jolomba (2015), Silva et al (2015), Marcondes et al (2016), Rodrigues et al (2016) and Dias et al (2017). On the other hand, the studies of Miller-Cushon et al (2013b) and Overvest et al (2016) had treatments which included forage.…”
Section: Development Of Databasementioning
confidence: 99%