2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and financial evaluation of various photovoltaic vertical facades on high-rise building in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But according to architectural creativity, different approaches to the BIPV system can be made based on climatic conditions. Ghazali [25] evaluated the cost and performance of Photovoltaic (PV) façade on building envelope (facade) using System Advisor Model (SAM) developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to estimate the potential of PV that applied on a vertical facade in Malaysia. A Heterojunction Intrinsic Thin-film module (HIT-Si) had been used with 15.6% of nominal efficiency.…”
Section: Application Of Building Integrated Photovoltaicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But according to architectural creativity, different approaches to the BIPV system can be made based on climatic conditions. Ghazali [25] evaluated the cost and performance of Photovoltaic (PV) façade on building envelope (facade) using System Advisor Model (SAM) developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to estimate the potential of PV that applied on a vertical facade in Malaysia. A Heterojunction Intrinsic Thin-film module (HIT-Si) had been used with 15.6% of nominal efficiency.…”
Section: Application Of Building Integrated Photovoltaicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The south and the north, however, are less irradiating. Although the roof of the building (horizontal facade) received higher incident radiation than the skin of the building (vertical facade) due to the wider area, it maximised the vertical facade to the east and west, employing a panel system that could produce significantly higher energy per year, of around 800 MWh [25].…”
Section: Application Of Building Integrated Photovoltaicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the design of the BIPV system, the optimum components' sizing and the orientation and inclination of the solar panels were evaluated and validated using PVsyst v.6 (PVsyst SA, Satigny, Switzerland) software (in line with other studies [15][16][17]), using a three-dimensional model to take into consideration the shadings (Figure 3), provided that partial shading has been identified as the main cause of yield and performance ratio (PR) reductions in PV systems [15].…”
Section: Bipv System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study identified that BIPV systems could be competitive with rooftop systems. Ghazali et al evaluated the technical and economic performance of vertical PV facades for use in high‐rise buildings in Malaysia using the System Advisor Model tool . The annual energy output and the payback period of the systems were estimated to be 400–700 MWh and 12 years, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghazali et al evaluated the technical and economic performance of vertical PV facades for use in high-rise buildings in Malaysia using the System Advisor Model tool. 20 The annual energy output and the payback period of the systems were estimated to be 400-700 MWh and 12 years, respectively. The payback period of three BIPV systems including amorphous silicon, single-crystalline silicon, and multi-crystalline silicon were assessed and it was found that the energy payback period of these systems are far below the LCC, suggesting that the systems are theoretically feasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%