22nd Joint Propulsion Conference 1986
DOI: 10.2514/6.1986-1435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and endurance tests of a multipropellant resistojet for space station auxiliary propulsion

Abstract: This paper presents the results of an effort by the NASA Lewis Research Center (LeRC) to demonstrate the technology readiness of a long-life multipropellant resistojet for Space Station auxiliary propulsion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was further assumed that a 10% cathode mass loss (in the discharge region) represents an end-of-life condition; this criteria is consistent with the lamp industry and resistojet heater end-of-life predictions. 62 Assumptions concerning cathode diameter and discharge conditions (/ = 5000 A) are shown in Table 2. The projected lifetimes of the quasisteadystate, 0.27-MW, self-field, low-power applied field, and 0.12-MW applied-field thrusters using these assumptions are 0.6, 21, 240, and 1 5,000 h, respectively.…”
Section: Thruster Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was further assumed that a 10% cathode mass loss (in the discharge region) represents an end-of-life condition; this criteria is consistent with the lamp industry and resistojet heater end-of-life predictions. 62 Assumptions concerning cathode diameter and discharge conditions (/ = 5000 A) are shown in Table 2. The projected lifetimes of the quasisteadystate, 0.27-MW, self-field, low-power applied field, and 0.12-MW applied-field thrusters using these assumptions are 0.6, 21, 240, and 1 5,000 h, respectively.…”
Section: Thruster Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This configuration prevents wasteful heat loss and realizes high-efficiency thermal insulation. Besides, the planar-shape heater is difficult to break as compared to a filament-type resistojet [5]. Figure 1 shows the cross-sectional view of the 3D-printed resistojet (3DRJ).…”
Section: Design and Theoretical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%