2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2016.7794915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and complexity of tunable sparse network coding with gradual growing tuning functions over wireless networks

Abstract: Abstract-Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) has been shown to be a technique with several benefits, in particular when applied over wireless mesh networks, since it provides robustness against packet losses. On the other hand, Tunable Sparse Network Coding (TSNC) is a promising concept, which leverages a trade-off between computational complexity and goodput. An optimal density tuning function has not been found yet, due to the lack of a closed-form expression that links density, performance and computational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many other sparse variants of random linear network coding, including chunked codes (e.g., [ 28 , 29 ]), tunable sparse network coding (e.g., [ 30 , 31 ], and sliding-window coding (e.g., [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]). While many of these codes can also be applied, BATS codes are more suitable for this distributed computing scenario.…”
Section: Bats-code-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many other sparse variants of random linear network coding, including chunked codes (e.g., [ 28 , 29 ]), tunable sparse network coding (e.g., [ 30 , 31 ], and sliding-window coding (e.g., [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]). While many of these codes can also be applied, BATS codes are more suitable for this distributed computing scenario.…”
Section: Bats-code-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the decoding process has complexity of order O(N 3 ), density of encoding packets should be controlled such that optimal decoding complexity was to be maintained depending upon the network resources available. Garrido et al [39] introduced different approaches to control the density of encoding packets depending upon the feedback information from destination nodes at encoding nodes and they evaluated reduced complexity of 3.5 times without degradation of network performances. In [40], authors proposed a generation-based network coding (GNC) with an overhead-optimized decoder that combines precoding rate and random overlapping generations to obtain low decoding costs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in programming implementation, still imposes high memory requirement for efficient random access of sparse matrix elements [ 21 ], otherwise the pivoting speed is significantly sacrificed. In practice, even for a moderate as a few hundreds, the decoding speed of sparse GE can be unsatisfactory [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%