2014
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Carcass Quality of Forage-Fed Steers as an Alternative to Concentrate-Based Beef Production

Abstract: This paper studies the performance and carcass quality of Parda de Montaña cattle under different management systems to find alternatives to concentrate feed indoor beef production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No difference in carcass weights was observed by Myers et al (1999) for young steers managed at pasture for 82 days after weaning or fed concentrate, nor by Berge et al (1991) for young bulls managed at pasture or fed grass or maize silage (ad lib or rationed). Furthermore, bulls fed a total mixed ration (TMRlucerne and maize) for 5 months, managed at pasture for 6 months, then slaughtered at similar weights generated similar carcass characteristics as bulls fed concentrate for 6 months (Blanco et al 2014). In this latter study, the rotation TMR/pasture/TMR over a period of 10 months generated carcasses with lower conformation scores and carcass yield and higher fat scores.…”
Section: Growth Periodmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…No difference in carcass weights was observed by Myers et al (1999) for young steers managed at pasture for 82 days after weaning or fed concentrate, nor by Berge et al (1991) for young bulls managed at pasture or fed grass or maize silage (ad lib or rationed). Furthermore, bulls fed a total mixed ration (TMRlucerne and maize) for 5 months, managed at pasture for 6 months, then slaughtered at similar weights generated similar carcass characteristics as bulls fed concentrate for 6 months (Blanco et al 2014). In this latter study, the rotation TMR/pasture/TMR over a period of 10 months generated carcasses with lower conformation scores and carcass yield and higher fat scores.…”
Section: Growth Periodmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The continuous provision of an unnaturally energy‐rich diet and reduced physical activity under zoo conditions can explain this difference (Hatt & Clauss, ). The positive correlation between diet and growth rate is well‐known in farm animals (Blanco et al, ; Borton et al, ; Pla, ), has been detected in reptiles (Ritz et al, ), as well as in several primate species (Leigh, ) and nutria (Głogowski et al, ) and might exist in further wildlife species. Moreover, dependence of height growth on caloric intake has been demonstrated in humans (Berkey, Gardner, Frazier, & Colditz, ; Fomon et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The positive correlation between diet and growth rate is well-known in farm animals (Blanco et al, 2014;Borton et al, 2005;Pla, 2008), has been detected in reptiles (Ritz et al, 2010), as well as in several primate species (Leigh, 1994) and nutria and might exist in further wildlife species. Moreover, dependence of height growth on caloric intake has been demonstrated in humans (Berkey, Gardner, Frazier, & Colditz, 2000;Fomon et al, 1969).…”
Section: Calves and Juvenilesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…36 A finishing period of 84 days for TMR beef increased ADG by 46.6% when compared with grazing steers, 16 whereas the finishing period (56 days) in the current experiment increased ADG by 31.4%. 9 It could be hypothesized that despite the compensatory growth in both studies, the shorter finishing period in the current experiment may have not allowed a reduction in the connective tissue's impact on toughness. 43 Beef tenderization in the current experiment was similar to that of concentrate-fed young bulls slaughtered at 550 kg LW, 44 estimated using the maximum load, which was approximately 13% in the first week and 16% in the second week.…”
Section: Meat Color Pigment Contents and Instrumental Texturementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The different results could be related to ADG in the finishing period, which can affect instrumental texture . A finishing period of 84 days for TMR beef increased ADG by 46.6% when compared with grazing steers, whereas the finishing period (56 days) in the current experiment increased ADG by 31.4% . It could be hypothesized that despite the compensatory growth in both studies, the shorter finishing period in the current experiment may have not allowed a reduction in the connective tissue's impact on toughness …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%