2016 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/peci.2016.7459250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of the Slip mode frequency shift islanding detection method under different inverter interface control strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] and [1] have demonstrated that in constant power control islanding detection is more difficult, so that the following simulations are based on constant power control. At 0.2 s, switch Sg (see Fig.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9] and [1] have demonstrated that in constant power control islanding detection is more difficult, so that the following simulations are based on constant power control. At 0.2 s, switch Sg (see Fig.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two famous ones are Sandia Frequency Shift (SFS) and Slip-Mode Frequency Shift (SMS), which belong to frequency shift methods and have been the classic active islanding detection methods up to the present day [1]- [6]. In addition, [7] and [8] proposed two methods based on the relationships between reactive power and frequency; [9] and [10] added a reactive power perturbation on the basis of SMS and SFS; [11] proposed a method based on a relationship between active power and voltage; [12] proposed the concept of perturbing reactive current, and [13]- [15] realized and tested it. Although new methods are constantly emerging, SFS and SMS are still being widely used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output currents of the inverter are controlled as a sinusoidal function of the frequency deviation of the voltage at PCC with respect to the network frequency before islanding. Thus, the inverter output currents can be expressed as in (6) [6]. (6) in which fvk-1 is the frequency of voltage at PCC in the previous cycle and θSMS is the phase angle shift for SMS method.…”
Section: A Slip Mode Frequency-shift (Sms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the inverter output currents can be expressed as in (6) [6]. (6) in which fvk-1 is the frequency of voltage at PCC in the previous cycle and θSMS is the phase angle shift for SMS method. θSMS is given in (7)…”
Section: A Slip Mode Frequency-shift (Sms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation