2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of single board computer clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] However, in some cases, SBC is used for the computing section; to reduce computation power volume for a portable cluster. [5] For example, the single board can also use for clustering or test application similar to supercomputing techniques alike Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) and Message Passing Interface (MPI). [11] This research will implement the SBC testing operation and configuration as follow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] However, in some cases, SBC is used for the computing section; to reduce computation power volume for a portable cluster. [5] For example, the single board can also use for clustering or test application similar to supercomputing techniques alike Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) and Message Passing Interface (MPI). [11] This research will implement the SBC testing operation and configuration as follow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study presented a Pi Stack, which reduces the computing power and low cost to support edge computing applications, and it also has individual heartbeat monitoring in Pi Stack. [5] HPL is a benchmark that runs to find solutions to systems of linear equations = when A is a dense matrix or matrix where most of its members are not 0, with the time complexity of working as O(n 3 ) when using HPL to run on the device will get one FLOPS number. HPL is considered a suitable measure method since most scientific work presently implied a lot of linear system equations and measurement by floating-point numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Internet case, M0 device configuration was used for simulation on all nodes, while for IoT devices three types of configurations M1-M3 were applied. Device parameters were selected on the basis of the real hardware used in Industrial Edge Computing studies [21], [22] and Cyber-Physical systems [23], [24] used for studying connected automated vehicles, together with large scaled video analysis platforms; their values are presented in Table I. Device M1 represents Raspberry PI 3 hardware, M2 is a LinkIt Smart 7688 Du IoT device, and M3 is ESP32 SoC. These values represent the maximum values of the parameters the device can reach.…”
Section: B Controllable Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is also suitable to run on smaller processors. The Raspberry Pi is capable of 0.132GFLOPs [43] and the ARM‐core Cortex‐A9 (a common mobile phone processor) is capable of 0.372GFLOPs [44]; therefore, in this example, the optimisation algorithm uses 11.9% and 4.2% of the respective processors' capacity. Note that although this optimisation algorithm is implementable in real time, it still requires a large amount of computation compared to other calculations undertaken to update the control signal: for example, calculating u(t) for a given value of Θ(t) and x(t), through (51) and (7), requires only 334 floating point operations per time‐step (3.34×106GFLOPs).…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%