2015 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2015.7394418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of pre-equalized multilevel partial response schemes

Abstract: Abstract-In order to achieve high speed on electrical interconnects, channel attenuation at high frequencies must be dealt with by proper transceiver design. In this paper we investigate finitecomplexity MMSE pre-equalization under an average transmit power constraint, to compensate for channel distortion in the case of both full-response and precoded partial response signaling with L-PAM mapping, and consider the resulting error performance for symbol-by-symbol detection and sequence detection. For a represen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BER is obtained by following the derivation outlined in [17]. For a given H ch (f ), and assuming correct past decisions, the sample u(k) from (2) can be decomposed as…”
Section: Ber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BER is obtained by following the derivation outlined in [17]. For a given H ch (f ), and assuming correct past decisions, the sample u(k) from (2) can be decomposed as…”
Section: Ber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take the constraint (1) into account, we consider the unconstrained minimization of the Lagrangian MSE cond + λh T pr R tr h pr over (h pr , α), where MSE cond is given by (16) Premultiplying (17) with h T pr , multiplying (18) with α and subtracting the resulting equations, we obtain α 2 µ = λE s /σ 2 a or equivalently, λ = α 2 µ with µ = σ 2 ν /E s . Substituting this value of λ into (17) and solving for h pr yields (6). The value of α results from the constraint (1), yielding (5).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%