2018 12th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/tssa.2018.8708803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Microstrip Circular Patch Antenna Composed of Artificial Dielectric Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the 10dB bandwidth of circular patch microstrip antennas made of ADM is 43.4% narrower than conventional circular patch microstrip antennas. Then, the gain value of circular patch microstrip antenna with ADM is relatively higher, namely 5.54 dBi and 6.1dBi for each antenna with 82 and 110 wires, compared to conventional circular patch microstrip antenna with 5.24dBi gain [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the 10dB bandwidth of circular patch microstrip antennas made of ADM is 43.4% narrower than conventional circular patch microstrip antennas. Then, the gain value of circular patch microstrip antenna with ADM is relatively higher, namely 5.54 dBi and 6.1dBi for each antenna with 82 and 110 wires, compared to conventional circular patch microstrip antenna with 5.24dBi gain [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In [7], the researcher stated that using artificial dielectric between the patch and the ground plane can determine the performance of circular patch microstrip antennas. In the research, FR4-Epoxy material was used as the host dielectric.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the measurement results, the artificial dielectric material is proven to reduce the dimensions of the antenna by 16.3% and 24.8%, respectively, to increase the antenna's gain by 5.73% and 16.41%, respectively. However, unfortunately, the bandwidth reduces by 43.4% than the microstrip antenna with natural material [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results show that the use of 82 wire conductors causes the resonant frequency to be 16.3% lower than conventional antennas. While the use of 110 conductor wire causes the resonant frequency to be 24.8% lower than conventional antennas [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%