2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2014.6944755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a Principal Component Analysis ensemble classifier for Emotiv headset P300 spellers

Abstract: The current trend to use Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) with mobile devices mandates the development of efficient EEG data processing methods. In this paper, we demonstrate the performance of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ensemble classifier for P300-based spellers. We recorded EEG data from multiple subjects using the Emotiv neuroheadset in the context of a classical oddball P300 speller paradigm. We compare the performance of the proposed ensemble classifier to the performance of traditional feature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike traditional approaches, we apply PCA to the data recorded on each individual channel of the training data to find the principal components of each channel [5]. The training data are then projected on the selected principal components.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike traditional approaches, we apply PCA to the data recorded on each individual channel of the training data to find the principal components of each channel [5]. The training data are then projected on the selected principal components.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we reduced the number of trials for each symbol to 10 trials compared to 15 trials which we used in our previous studies [4,5]. For each of the 6 subjects, we recorded a labeled dataset of 20 characters as training data and an unlabeled online testing dataset of 12 symbols (i.e.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations