Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICME2019) 2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0037666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis and enhancement of GE LM6000PC gas turbine-based power generation in Bangladesh; an approach to increase the offline water wash cycle interval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the decision to perform a water wash is made based on economic reasons: the cost of keeping the engine stopped between 6 and 8 hours, the cost of use of the required auxiliaries to complete the washing, the cost of water and chemicals, and finally the associated cost of labor must be more than compensated by the improvement in TSFC. The cost of completing the water wash is reasonably low (see [131] for a cost evaluation in a LM6000 engine during a year, meaning between 25,000 and 30,000 USD per year, washing twice per month, but engine-specific intervals will depend on usage) comparing with the cost of keeping the engine stopped (so the loss of passengers in an aircraft, or the production loss in a power plant). If an improvement in TSFC of a 1.5% average was feasible with water washes, -269 -in the case of the engine used in this thesis, that would mean a direct fuel cost saving in the order of a minimum of 105,000 USD per year (assuming 3,000 hours of cruise operation each year service, see US public data available from 2020 in [196]), and per engine, with fuel prices taken by November 2021.…”
Section: 2-business Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the decision to perform a water wash is made based on economic reasons: the cost of keeping the engine stopped between 6 and 8 hours, the cost of use of the required auxiliaries to complete the washing, the cost of water and chemicals, and finally the associated cost of labor must be more than compensated by the improvement in TSFC. The cost of completing the water wash is reasonably low (see [131] for a cost evaluation in a LM6000 engine during a year, meaning between 25,000 and 30,000 USD per year, washing twice per month, but engine-specific intervals will depend on usage) comparing with the cost of keeping the engine stopped (so the loss of passengers in an aircraft, or the production loss in a power plant). If an improvement in TSFC of a 1.5% average was feasible with water washes, -269 -in the case of the engine used in this thesis, that would mean a direct fuel cost saving in the order of a minimum of 105,000 USD per year (assuming 3,000 hours of cruise operation each year service, see US public data available from 2020 in [196]), and per engine, with fuel prices taken by November 2021.…”
Section: 2-business Casementioning
confidence: 99%