The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00484-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perforation pseudotumorale du cæcum par un os de canard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These potentially incriminating pathologies that can present as acute cecal pathology have been tabulated in Table 2 . [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ] But only some of these conditions are commonly encountered in the clinical practice, and they deserve special attention owing to their dismal outcome. It may be noted that in most of the above-mentioned causes of acute primary cecal pathology, patients were initially suspected to be having acute appendicitis or appendicular perforation and the cecal pathology was appreciated only intra-operatively or on post-operative HPE reporting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These potentially incriminating pathologies that can present as acute cecal pathology have been tabulated in Table 2 . [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ] But only some of these conditions are commonly encountered in the clinical practice, and they deserve special attention owing to their dismal outcome. It may be noted that in most of the above-mentioned causes of acute primary cecal pathology, patients were initially suspected to be having acute appendicitis or appendicular perforation and the cecal pathology was appreciated only intra-operatively or on post-operative HPE reporting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%