2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous thermal ablation of primary and secondary lung tumors: Comparison between microwave and radiofrequency ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, IR procedures can be performed both for complication of the disease and for usual interventions especially for oncologic patients (i. e., tumor ablation, implantable ports, intra-arterial treatment and supportive care) [4][5][6]. A subset of intervention have been defined as high-risk interventions because of close proximity to the patient's face or high-risk of aerosolization [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, IR procedures can be performed both for complication of the disease and for usual interventions especially for oncologic patients (i. e., tumor ablation, implantable ports, intra-arterial treatment and supportive care) [4][5][6]. A subset of intervention have been defined as high-risk interventions because of close proximity to the patient's face or high-risk of aerosolization [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study reported similar efficacy and safety between the two techniques. However, this study fails to specify the recurrence and survival rates segmented by tumor type [25]. No prospective studies comparing both ablative techniques are currently available.…”
Section: Stage I Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the theoretical superiority of MWA has not resulted in results significantly different from those already reported for RFA: tumor diameter (> 3 cm) and proximity to a large vessel remain the main factors associated with a higher incidence of incomplete treatment [23]. Nevertheless, MWA may allow the treatment of larger tumors than RFA since tissue impedance does not limit the action of MWA [24,25].…”
Section: Ablative Modalities Available For Lung Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that size and safety margins are prognostic factors of successful lung thermal ablation [39], and that median overall survival after lung ablation is beyond 5 years [40]. Microwave ablation seems to induce less pneumothorax than RFA [41]. Furthermore, the risk of prolonged intensive care is moderated when patient have a lung parenchyma without underlying disease even if the possibility of admission in such unit has to be discussed according the general status of the hospital.…”
Section: Lung Metastases and Primary Lung Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%