No abstract

No abstract

HAL is a multidisciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

BPH ¼ benign prostatic hyperplasia, IIEF ¼ International Index of Erectile Function, IPSS ¼ International Prostate Symptom Score, LUTS ¼ lower urinary tract symptoms, MIST ¼ minimally invasive surgical therapies, OP ¼ open prostatectomy, PAE ¼ prostatic artery embolization, PVR ¼ postvoid residual, QOL ¼ quality of life, RCT ¼ randomized controlled trial, TURP ¼ transurethral resection of the prostate, UK-ROPE ¼ United Kingdom Register of Prostate Embolization BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) describes the proliferation of the glandular and stromal tissue in the transition zone of the prostate, which may result in bladder outlet obstruction and consequent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The prevalence of BPH increases with age, affecting more than 70% of men older than 70 years (1), and one fourth of men older than 70 years have moderate to severe LUTS that impair their quality of life (QOL) (2,3). Thus, BPH and ensuing LUTS represent a significant health issue affecting millions of men. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; also known as the American Urologic Association Symptom Index) is a validated instrument that quantifies a patient's subjective urinary symptoms on a 35-point scale (4). The IPSS also incorporates a urinary QOL score, which assesses how the patient feels overall about his urinary symptoms. Nearly all studies assessing BPH treatments for LUTS use the IPSS and QOL scores to assess patients before and after treatment. A 3-point change in IPSS is noticeable by a man with LUTS (5), and a 30% reduction in IPSS is considered clinically acceptable for a treatment to be considered effective (6,7). Medical therapies, including a-1 blockers and 5-a reductase inhibitors, are the mainstay of treatment for mild to moderate LUTS. The symptomatic relief is relatively modest, with IPSS improvement in the range of 3-7 points (8). Although generally considered safe, medical

No abstract

No abstract

Twenty-one patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) followed by attempted insertion of a self-expandable vascular endoprosthesis for femoropopliteal lesions were prospectively followed up for an average of 17.6 months with angiographic, Doppler ultrasound, and clinical examinations. Stents were placed bilaterally in one patient. Of the 22 lesions, 18 were total occlusions and four, stenoses. Stent placement was successful in 21 of 22 lesions. Nine occlusions occurred: four in the first 30 days and five 1-5 months after PTA. Three patients developed intrastent intimal hyperplasia that necessitated an additional percutaneous procedure. At 12 months, the patency rate without other interventions (the primary patency rate) was 49%. In patients who underwent secondary intervention (fibrinolysis, atherectomy, or PTA), the secondary patency rate was 67%, which fell to 56% after 18 months. At the end of the study, the overall rate of reocclusion was 43%. It is concluded that use of the self-expandable vascular endoprosthesis in the femoropopliteal region likely does not decrease the reocclusion rate after PTA alone. Its use is indicated for treatment of acute closures after femoropopliteal PTA.

The membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice Committee represents experts in a broad spectrum of interventional procedures from the private and academic sectors of medicine. Generally, Standards of Practice Committee members dedicate the vast majority of their professional time to performing interventional procedures; as such, they represent a valid broad expert constituency of the subject matter under consideration for standards production.Technical documents specifying the exact consensus and literature review methodologies as well as the institutional affiliations and professional credentials of the authors of this document are available upon request from SIR, 3975 Fair Ridge Dr., Suite 400 N., Fairfax, VA 22033. METHODOLOGYSIR produces its Standards of Practice documents using the following process. Standards documents of relevance and timeliness are conceptualized by the Standards of Practice Committee members. A recognized expert is identified to serve as the principal author for the standard. Additional authors may be assigned dependent upon the magnitude of the project.An in-depth literature search is performed using electronic medical literature databases. Then, a critical review of peer-reviewed articles is performed with regard to the study methodology, results, and conclusions. The qualitative weight of these articles is assembled into an evidence table, which is used to write the document such that it contains evidence-based data with respect to content, rates, and thresholds (Fig E1 and Table E1, available online at www.jvir.org).When the evidence of literature is weak, conflicting, or contradictory, consensus for the parameter is reached by a minimum of 12 Standards of Practice Committee members using a modified Delphi consensus method (Appendix A). For purposes of these documents, consensus is defined as 80% Delphi participant agreement on a value or parameter.The draft document is critically reviewed by the Standards of Practice Committee members by telephone conference calling or face-to-face meeting. The finalized draft from the Committee is sent to the SIR membership for further input/criticism during a 30-day comment period. These comments are discussed by the Standards of Practice Committee, and appropriate revisions are made to create the finished standards document. Prior to its publication, the document is endorsed by the SIR Executive Council.