2019
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: Background and objectivesChronic neuropathic pain is a common challenging condition following amputation. Recent research demonstrated the feasibility of percutaneously implanting fine-wire coiled peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) leads in proximity to the sciatic and femoral nerves for postamputation pain. A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study collected data on the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous PNS for chronic neuropathic pain following amputation.MethodsTwenty-eight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

13
120
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(15 reference statements)
13
120
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…78,79 Percutaneous PNS provides an opportunity as an earlier neurostimulation intervention that may preclude the need for opioids, denervation, surgery, and permanently implanted systems, particularly given evidence of long-term relief in patients with chronic pain. 80,81,[83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] A recently published double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy of percutaneous PNS in the treatment of chronic postamputation pain demonstrated significant and durable pain relief and improvement in quality of life with results sustained through 1 year. 97,81 The present investigation was designed as a prospective case series study to determine the feasibility of generating similar sustainable reductions in pain and disability and improvements in quality of life in patients with LBP using the same device.…”
Section: Treatments For Chronic Lbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78,79 Percutaneous PNS provides an opportunity as an earlier neurostimulation intervention that may preclude the need for opioids, denervation, surgery, and permanently implanted systems, particularly given evidence of long-term relief in patients with chronic pain. 80,81,[83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] A recently published double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy of percutaneous PNS in the treatment of chronic postamputation pain demonstrated significant and durable pain relief and improvement in quality of life with results sustained through 1 year. 97,81 The present investigation was designed as a prospective case series study to determine the feasibility of generating similar sustainable reductions in pain and disability and improvements in quality of life in patients with LBP using the same device.…”
Section: Treatments For Chronic Lbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article by Gilmore et al 7 in this issue emphasizes the renaissance of PNS in the 21st century. Beyond its application for pain treatment, electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves has demonstrated potential in neural regeneration 23.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although their primary outcome of >50% pain relief at 4 weeks was met in the treatment arm, surprisingly the crossover patients did not have similar results 7. All leads were placed under ultrasound guidance, but stimulation testing was not performed for patients in the “placebo arm.” The results may justify lead testing in future studies to ensure optimal placement of the PNS lead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations