1985
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.144.3.457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous extraction of renal stones: experience in 100 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since patients treated by percutaneous extraction have a shorter convalescence, they are able to return to normal activities much sooner than those undergoing conventional surgical stone removal [7][8][9]. This earlier return to work, the absence of a surgical scar, and the relative ease with which these procedures may be performed in patients with previous surgery have made the percutaneous approach the preferred method of treating renal stones in many hospitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since patients treated by percutaneous extraction have a shorter convalescence, they are able to return to normal activities much sooner than those undergoing conventional surgical stone removal [7][8][9]. This earlier return to work, the absence of a surgical scar, and the relative ease with which these procedures may be performed in patients with previous surgery have made the percutaneous approach the preferred method of treating renal stones in many hospitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%