1998
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.5.517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous closure of secundum atrial septal defect with a new self centring device ("angel wings")

Abstract: Objective-To investigate the safety, eYcacy, and clinical application of a new self centring device ("angel wings") for closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASD II) and persistent foramen ovale in all age groups. Design-Multicentre, prospective, nonrandomised study. Modifications of the design, however, seem to be mandatory as 4% of patients developed serious complications. (Heart 1998;80:517-521) Patients-Inclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
50
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, which is the best device for closure of ASD remains controversial. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] For central-located secundum ASD of small to medium size, closure with a device is strongly recommended. Sideris' button device had been reported to successfully close secundum ASD in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, which is the best device for closure of ASD remains controversial. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] For central-located secundum ASD of small to medium size, closure with a device is strongly recommended. Sideris' button device had been reported to successfully close secundum ASD in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Transcatheter closure with different devices, such as Rashkind umbrella, Sideris' occluder, angel wings device, ASDOS occluder, and Clamshell device have been tried on human beings within the last 20 years. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The initial results were reported as acceptable, but opinions on the best device for transcatheter closure of ASD vary widely. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] A total of 12 children were enrolled in the present study to evaluate the immediate and intermediate results of transcatheter closure of ASD by a Cardio-SEAL device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device had two polyester fabric-covered square frames and a Nitinol frame with midpoint torsion spring eyelets. A circular hole with a diameter equal to one-half of the size of the disk was punched from the right disk with the margins sewn to the left-sided disk forming a www.intechopen.com conjoined ring, the centering mechanism (Rickers et al, 1998). Device sizes ranging from 12 to 40 mm were manufactured.…”
Section: Das Angel Wing Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials were undertaken in US and abroad (Rickers et al, 1998;Banerjee et al, 1999). Phase I clinical trial included 90 patients; 50 of these were ostium secundum ASDs (Banerjee et al, 1999;Das et al, 2003).…”
Section: Das Angel Wing Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrombus developed on eight different types of transcatheter devices. All commercially available devices had at least one reported case of thrombosis: PFO-Star (17 patients) [4,5,8,15], ASDOS (13 patients) [5,7,[13][14][15], CardioSEAL Starflex (9 patients) [5,12,18,20], CardioSEAL (5 patients) [5,9,16,17,19], Angel Wings (4 patients) [5,17], Amplatzer (4 patients) [5,6,10,15], Buttoned (1 patient) [11], and Helex (1 patient) [5]. Patient age was available in half of the cases (mean age, 44.2 Ϯ 9.8 years).…”
Section: Thrombus Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%