2000
DOI: 10.1536/jhj.41.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect with a CardioSEAL Device

Abstract: SUMMARYTranscatheter closure of an interatrial septal defect (ASD) with a CardioSEAL device was successfully performed on 12 Taiwanese children. There were five boys and seven girls, aged from 3.6-13.9 (8.3 ± 3.2) years and with body weight of 15-57 (33.7 ± 14.7) kgs. After one year of follow-up studies, which included physical examination, ECG, chest X-ray and echocardiography, complete closure of ASD was achieved in nine (75%) patients. Two children with a trivial residual shunt were asymptomatic and without… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 To a lesser degree, the more flexible devices, notably the CardioSEAL and STARflex, are used as alternatives in several centres. 13,21,22,35,36 A disadvantage of the latter devices is that they remain under trial in the United States of America. In smaller defects, those measuring less than 18 millimetres, comparison between the CardioSEAL/STARflex devices and the Amplatzer device has shown a low rate of complications in both, but shorter fluoroscopic and procedural times, as well as higher rates of complete occlusion, in the group of patients closed with the Amplatzer device.…”
Section: Present State and Clinical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 To a lesser degree, the more flexible devices, notably the CardioSEAL and STARflex, are used as alternatives in several centres. 13,21,22,35,36 A disadvantage of the latter devices is that they remain under trial in the United States of America. In smaller defects, those measuring less than 18 millimetres, comparison between the CardioSEAL/STARflex devices and the Amplatzer device has shown a low rate of complications in both, but shorter fluoroscopic and procedural times, as well as higher rates of complete occlusion, in the group of patients closed with the Amplatzer device.…”
Section: Present State and Clinical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%