Abstract:Image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for adrenal tumors in patients who are unable to undergo adrenalectomy. Accordingly, this treatment has become more readily available for treating functioning or non-functioning adrenal masses. Thus, endocrinologists need a better understanding of percutaneous RFA of adrenal tumors. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe the basic mechanism of RFA, indications and contraindications, patient preparation pri… Show more
“…Nevertheless, the ability to achieve complete ablation and technical success is high, and complete ablation is between 92% and 96% can be expected to have a low complication rate [ 1 , 11 – 15 , 86 ]. This is a significant improvement from earlier series that showed a 79% technical success rate [ 13 ] for clinical outcomes associated with hormonally active adrenal tumors such as aldosteronoma, cortisol-secreting adenoma, and pheochromocytoma [ 6 , 87 – 92 ]. The majority of the current data is centered around RFA, with ablation of aldosteronomas being more commonly performed than the ablation of cortisol-secreting adenomas or pheochromocytomas [ 87 – 92 ].…”
Section: Treatment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Percutaneous biopsy is not necessary in patients with benign functioning masses prior to adrenal ablations unlike with renal, lung, or thyroid ablations because hormonal analysis alone can replace the invasive procedure to confirm the histologic diagnoses [ 2 , 6 ]. It is mandatory in patients with extra-adrenal malignancy to determine if an adrenal mass is a metastatic tumor.…”
Section: Considerations Prior To Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the current data is centered around RFA, with ablation of aldosteronomas being more commonly performed than the ablation of cortisol-secreting adenomas or pheochromocytomas [ 87 – 92 ]. Short- and long-term resolution of biochemistry can range from between 90% to 100% (median, 100%) [ 6 , 87 – 92 ], and normalization of aldosterone, renin, and aldosterone to renin ratio can be achieved in almost all cases of aldosteronoma [ 87 – 90 , 92 ]. However, persistent hypertension can occur despite normalization of hormones [ 87 , 88 , 90 , 92 ].…”
Section: Treatment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many kinds of ablation guidelines for these extra-adrenal organs have been established and updated for years. However, we only have several review articles that deal with adrenal ablation, but there is much overlap in terms of their content [ 1 – 6 ]. They have mainly focused on technical points only for those who are already used to interventional radiology.…”
Thermal ablation is a good alternative treatment in patients who are unable to undergo adrenalectomy. Even though the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation (ACTA) has been held for many years, adrenal ablation guidelines have not been established. No guidelines for adrenal ablation are established in American and European countries, either. The aim of this review was to introduce the first version of ACTA guidelines for adrenal tumor ablation.
“…Nevertheless, the ability to achieve complete ablation and technical success is high, and complete ablation is between 92% and 96% can be expected to have a low complication rate [ 1 , 11 – 15 , 86 ]. This is a significant improvement from earlier series that showed a 79% technical success rate [ 13 ] for clinical outcomes associated with hormonally active adrenal tumors such as aldosteronoma, cortisol-secreting adenoma, and pheochromocytoma [ 6 , 87 – 92 ]. The majority of the current data is centered around RFA, with ablation of aldosteronomas being more commonly performed than the ablation of cortisol-secreting adenomas or pheochromocytomas [ 87 – 92 ].…”
Section: Treatment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Percutaneous biopsy is not necessary in patients with benign functioning masses prior to adrenal ablations unlike with renal, lung, or thyroid ablations because hormonal analysis alone can replace the invasive procedure to confirm the histologic diagnoses [ 2 , 6 ]. It is mandatory in patients with extra-adrenal malignancy to determine if an adrenal mass is a metastatic tumor.…”
Section: Considerations Prior To Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the current data is centered around RFA, with ablation of aldosteronomas being more commonly performed than the ablation of cortisol-secreting adenomas or pheochromocytomas [ 87 – 92 ]. Short- and long-term resolution of biochemistry can range from between 90% to 100% (median, 100%) [ 6 , 87 – 92 ], and normalization of aldosterone, renin, and aldosterone to renin ratio can be achieved in almost all cases of aldosteronoma [ 87 – 90 , 92 ]. However, persistent hypertension can occur despite normalization of hormones [ 87 , 88 , 90 , 92 ].…”
Section: Treatment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many kinds of ablation guidelines for these extra-adrenal organs have been established and updated for years. However, we only have several review articles that deal with adrenal ablation, but there is much overlap in terms of their content [ 1 – 6 ]. They have mainly focused on technical points only for those who are already used to interventional radiology.…”
Thermal ablation is a good alternative treatment in patients who are unable to undergo adrenalectomy. Even though the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation (ACTA) has been held for many years, adrenal ablation guidelines have not been established. No guidelines for adrenal ablation are established in American and European countries, either. The aim of this review was to introduce the first version of ACTA guidelines for adrenal tumor ablation.
“…Imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation(RFA) has been proved to be effective in the treatment of liver tumors [5][6][7], More recently, it has been used to treat renal, adrenal, thyroid, and breast neoplasms [8][9][10][11]. RFA is a technique that relies on the delivery of RF energy through an electrode inserted in the tumor mass to generate a localised high temperatures eld that heats the target tissue, causing necrosis [12].…”
Objective: Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) has been recently applied as an alternative treatment in the patients with pulmonary malignancies. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of complications and survival rate of RFA for malignant lung nodules, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of RFA in the treatment of inoperable patients with pulmonary malignant nodules.
Methods: The clinical data of 50 patients (34 men and 16 women) aged 74.2(range 65-84) years with primary(n=42) and metastatic(n=8) lung malignant nodules treated with RFA from June 2015 and July 2017 in Hebei General Hospital were considered for this study, and the characteristics and clinical data of these patients were analyzed. Complications, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 1, 2 and 5 years of these patients were evaluated.
Results: Following the procedure. There were no major complications and deaths during the operation. 26(52%) patients presented mild-to-moderate chest pain that was easily controlled by analgesic drugs. 8(16%) patients with pneumothorax, 4(8%) haemoptysis, 6(12%) pneumonia, 7(14%) pleural effusion, and 1(2%) postoperative bronchopleural fistula. Needle-track implantation was observed in 2(4%) patients. Median progression-free survival(PFS) was 24.6 months(range, 6.8-60 months). The PFS at 1, 2, 5 years was 76%, 52%, and 20% respectively. Median overall survival(OS) was 35.5 months (range 10.2-60 months). The OS at 1, 2, and 5 years was 80%, 58%, and 32%, respectively.
Conclusion: RFA is a safe and effective alternative treatment for the inoperable patients with primary or metastatic pulmonary malignant nodules. The clinical impact and long-term results of RFA need to be further confirmed in a larger series of patients, and RFA should ideally be compared with surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.