Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2020.1755801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Simulation of Vertical Object Movement during Comprehension of Auditory and Audiovisual Text in Children and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, research suggests that children may represent not only static but also dynamic perceptual events. For example, Hauf et al (2020) and Seger et al (2020) demonstrated that children's responses to pictured objects on a computer screen were faster when the objects moved in the directions that matched the linguistic context. Consistently, there is evidence, similar to the adult literature, of embodied effects of perception on language processing in children.…”
Section: Embodiment Effects Emerge Late In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, research suggests that children may represent not only static but also dynamic perceptual events. For example, Hauf et al (2020) and Seger et al (2020) demonstrated that children's responses to pictured objects on a computer screen were faster when the objects moved in the directions that matched the linguistic context. Consistently, there is evidence, similar to the adult literature, of embodied effects of perception on language processing in children.…”
Section: Embodiment Effects Emerge Late In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such simulations are supposed to be largely based on the recipient's perceptual and motor experience (Glenberg & Robertson, 2000;Stanfield & Zwaan, 2001;Taylor & Zwaan, 2009). There are a considerable number of empirical findings confirming that text recipients simulate features of the situation through their perceptual and motor systems (e.g., de Koning, Wassenburg, Bos, & van der Schoot, 2017;Engelen, Bouwmeester, de Bruin, & Zwaan, 2011;Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002;Seger, Hauf, & Nieding, 2020;Zwaan, Stanfield, & Yaxley, 2002;Zwaan & Taylor, 2006). In Zwaan et al's (2002) study, for example, participants read a sentence (e.g., "The ranger saw the eagle in the sky") and had to decide whether a subsequent picture referred to an object that was included in that sentence.…”
Section: Text Surface Textbase and Situation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%