2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2015.2484221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Quality Assessment for 3D Triangle Mesh Based on Curvature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these metrics are independent of connectivity and designed for static meshes. Dong et al [16] propose a novel roughness-based perceptual quality assessment method. The novelty of the metric lies in the incorporation of structural similarity, visual masking, and saturation effect which are highly employed in quality assessment methods separately.…”
Section: Model-based Perceptual Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these metrics are independent of connectivity and designed for static meshes. Dong et al [16] propose a novel roughness-based perceptual quality assessment method. The novelty of the metric lies in the incorporation of structural similarity, visual masking, and saturation effect which are highly employed in quality assessment methods separately.…”
Section: Model-based Perceptual Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the local roughness is measured by Laplacian of the discrete Gaussian curvature. Another curvature based roughness estimation parameter is proposed by [6] where Gaussian [19] on which they computed the local statistics to generate a perceptual similarity index SMQI (Saliency based Mesh Quality Index). These perceptual quality based metrics are correlated with the subjective assessment of the same meshes.…”
Section: Curvature Based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing Mesh Visual Quality (MVQ) metrics construct a local quality map (distortion map) that provides vertex-wise or edge-wise quality (distortion), such as MSDM [1], MSDM2 [2], DAME [3], FMPD [4], TPDM [5], Lu [6], and then pool the local quantities into a final score that reflects the overall quality of the distorted mesh. The commonly used pooling strategies are average weighting [3]- [4], [6] and weighted Minkowski sum [1]- [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used pooling strategies are average weighting [3]- [4], [6] and weighted Minkowski sum [1]- [2], [5]. However, the pooling strategy of objective scores in mesh quality assessment is less investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation