“…The intelligibility of the NV sentences was low before training [mean ¼ 26.07%, standard error (SE) ¼ 1.91] and improved after training (mean-¼ 56.34%, SE ¼ 2.59). The intelligibility of untrained 4-band NV sentences also improved (relative to the matched pre-training sentences) after training (mean-¼ 40.50%, SE ¼ 2.10), which suggests that the training could generalize to new speech utterances, in line with previous reports (Davis et al, 2005;Sohoglu and Davis, 2016). Both improvements were significant [pre-vs post-trained: t(23) ¼ 18.34, p < 0.001; prevs post-untrained: t(23) ¼ 10.14, p < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected], but intelligibility after training was stronger for the trained sentences compared to the untrained sentences [t(23) ¼ 10.64, p < 0.001].…”