1993
DOI: 10.1159/000266220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: Reliability and Relevance

Abstract: A standardized, perceptually based description of hoarseness is of importance for clinical purposes (e.g. therapy evaluation) as well as in research on voice disorders. The reliability and relevance of perceptual parameters are investigated. The GRBAS scale parameters quite well fit the criteria: low intrajudge and interjudge variance but high intervoice variance. The best correlation between judges (0.7) is found for the overall grade of severity. Impressions of the asthenicstrained voice quality are less con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
81
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
6
81
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a tendency towards improved reliability in scoring, noted in the current study when subjects with laryngeal pathology were considered separately, was also found in Dedivitis' population of smokers. 44 This tendency also finds a partial resonance with Dejonckere and colleagues' finding that their raters tended to rate more severely for organic pathologies, 20 but is in contrast to the findings of Kreiman et al, who reported improved agreement for listeners judging the voices of normal subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a tendency towards improved reliability in scoring, noted in the current study when subjects with laryngeal pathology were considered separately, was also found in Dedivitis' population of smokers. 44 This tendency also finds a partial resonance with Dejonckere and colleagues' finding that their raters tended to rate more severely for organic pathologies, 20 but is in contrast to the findings of Kreiman et al, who reported improved agreement for listeners judging the voices of normal subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…20 Specific rating trends have been reported, including: highest agreement for overall severity (i.e. grade); 13,19 -22 greater test-retest reliability among more experienced raters and ( for some sub-scales) among speech and language pathologists compared with ENT surgeons; 19 more severe rating by patients themselves compared with speech and language therapists; 25 and improved inter-rater agreement with sustained use of the GRBAS scale over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sesin değerlendirilmesi için eğitimli kulak en ayırt edici enstrumandır. 7 Algısal değerlendirmenin kişiden kişiye değişiklik göstermesi, hatta aynı kişi tarafından farklı zamanlarda yapılan değerlendirmeler arasında da fark olması nedeniyle objektif ses değerlendirme yöntemleri kullanımı artmıştır. 4 Bu zorluğu aşmak için geniş veri tabanları üzerinde çalışılarak akustik parametreler ve ses kısıklığı düzeyi arasındaki ilişki araştırılmış ve yeni parametreler geliştirilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Outros pesquisadores (19)(20)(21)(22) citam como características bá-sicas de um paciente disártrico o esforço e a tensão ao falar, além de rouquidão e tremor vocal, variações de intensidade e frequência e interrupções da fonação e descrevem distúrbios fonatórios associados a patologias neurológicas. E outras pesquisas (2,6) relatam que os tipos de vozes mais frequentemente associados às doenças neurológicas são: tensa -estrangulada e soprosa.…”
Section: Fonaçãounclassified