2012 Fourth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cce.2012.6315921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual difference evaluation of video alternatives in adaptive streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [31] it was studied how spatial and temporal quality switching had different impact on the QoE and which features of the switching that were most relevant in relation to the QoE. The results reported in [42] investigated the optimum number of coding quality levels that could be used in an adaptive video system by studying the just noticeable difference levels that exist in the quality range of video content. The incorporation of the effects of frame rate and resolution adaptations on the user perception to obtain the encoding configuration that maximizes the QoE for a certain type of content has been investigated in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [31] it was studied how spatial and temporal quality switching had different impact on the QoE and which features of the switching that were most relevant in relation to the QoE. The results reported in [42] investigated the optimum number of coding quality levels that could be used in an adaptive video system by studying the just noticeable difference levels that exist in the quality range of video content. The incorporation of the effects of frame rate and resolution adaptations on the user perception to obtain the encoding configuration that maximizes the QoE for a certain type of content has been investigated in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ClosetoEdge video (43,24) is from a documentary and is mostly shot with a handheld camera and features varying characteristics. The Rollingstone video (45,42) is from a concert recording, where the lead singer moves around a lot and the video has some sudden scene changes. The News (49,23) video is from a TV news broadcast and has static scenes with one/two standing/sitting people, some scenes with moving background and some scenes without reporters with more motion and panning.…”
Section: Subjective Experiments Of Video Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we propose a novel trellis-based method that can find the best appropriate bitrates for near future segments. Especially, JND (Just Noticeable Difference [8] [9]) is used as a subjective quality metric to help the client in making the decision. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents for the first time a way to use a subjective quality metric for adaptivity in HTTP streaming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study outperforms the other available algorithms in terms of switching frequency, and usage of the available resources; however it does not take the amplitude of quality switches into account. Some subjective studies have already been published, for example, Thang et al studied the optimum number of coding quality levels that could be used in an adaptive video system by investigating the Just Noticeable Difference (JND) levels existing in the quality range of mobile video content taking into account the perceptual factors of the human visual system [9]. Their experiment was done by side-by-side comparison of different quality levels looking for noticeable differences.…”
Section: Dash Quality Metrics and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%