1992
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90047-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual closure and object identification: Electrophysiological responses to incomplete pictures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
36
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…indexed by the N350, whenever images have most (if not all) of their parts visible or recoverable, as in Pietrowsky et al [37], than when their parts are entirely missing, or not recoverable from the visible contours, as in Stuss et al [55] (Fig. 1); successful object identification from non-recoverable parts is first seen in the LPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…indexed by the N350, whenever images have most (if not all) of their parts visible or recoverable, as in Pietrowsky et al [37], than when their parts are entirely missing, or not recoverable from the visible contours, as in Stuss et al [55] (Fig. 1); successful object identification from non-recoverable parts is first seen in the LPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Two prior ERP studies comparing successful and failed identification reported divergence times that differed by a few 100 ms (600 ms [55] versus less than 300 ms [37]). Stuss et al [55] showed people fragmented line drawings of objects at four levels of completeness and found a broadly-distributed late positive complex (LPC) that diverged as a function of naming accuracy by 550-650 ms. Pietrowsky et al [37] replicated the LPC finding but also observed an earlier effect; identified landscapes first differed from unidentified and scrambled scenes by ∼250-300 ms in a frontal negativity peaking between 325 and 400 ms (N350) [37,45,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations