Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage

Abstract

Reading primary research literature is an essential skill for all scientists and students on science degree programmes, however little is known about how researchers at different career stages interact with and interpret scientific papers. To explore this, we conducted a survey of 260 undergraduate students and researchers in Biological Sciences at a research intensive UK university. Responses to Likert scale questions demonstrated increases in confidence and skill with reading the literature between individuals at each career stage, including between postdoctoral researchers and faculty academics. The survey indicated that individuals at different career stages valued different sections of scientific papers, and skill in reading the results section develops slowly over the course of an academic career. Inexperienced readers found the methods and results sections of research papers the most difficult to read, and undervalued the importance of the results section and critical interpretation of data. These data highlight a need for structured support with reading scientific literature at multiple career stages, and for senior academics to be aware that junior colleagues may prioritise their reading differently. We propose a model for the development of literature processing skills, and consider the need for training strategies to help inexperienced readers engage with primary literature, and therefore develop important skills that underpin scientific careers. We also encourage researchers to be mindful of language used when writing papers, and to be more inclusive of diverse audiences when disseminating their work.

How to Prepare for the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT): Six Important Tips for Pre-Medical Students from Rural Areas

“…Most of the questions related to these skills involve experimental data or scientific information in the passage and ask a student to solve a problem using the given information, relying on basic knowledge. Reading current scientific research literature and applying strategies such as selective and critical reading, assessing the authors conclusions, and identifying key ideas in the paper will benefit students through application of scientific reasoning and problem solving [32].…”

Research Literacy Level of Education Postgraduate Research Students using Rasch Measurement Model

“…The most difficult item in statistical literacy is -data interpretation‖. Lie et al (2016) and Hubbard and Dunbar (2017) revealed postgraduate students perceived that interpreting -experimental data‖ are difficult. This study proved that students are weak at interpreting results from table or graph.…”

The benefits of a press release coursework for undergraduates

“…Of the necessary transferable and research skills, the art of reading and understanding primary research papers is of upmost importance for developing thinking skills related to the scientific process. Nevertheless, undergraduate students find this difficult despite the availability of numerous resources and support, and consequently, scientific reading ability develops slowly over a scientific career (Hubbard & Dunbar, 2017). There is no doubt that it is important for science undergraduate students to immerse themselves in the primary research literature, and the intricacies of reading, interpretation and critical appraisal, as soon as is possible so they develop these competencies (Wenk & Tronsky, 2011).…”