Perceptions of rabies risk: a survey of travellers and travel clinics from Canada, Germany, Sweden and the UK

Abstract

BackgroundExtensive global experience shows that rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) through vaccination is effective and well tolerated, yet many travellers opt not to be vaccinated when travelling to rabies-endemic countries. Previous research has identified several factors influencing the choices travellers make to reduce the risk of rabies, including cost, time constraint and perspective on the importance of vaccination. The objectives of this study were to assess travellers’ awareness of rabies and advice-seeking attitudes and to evaluate travel clinics practices regarding rabies pre-travel advice.MethodsWe surveyed individuals aged 18–65 years residing in the UK, Germany, Canada and Sweden who had travelled to rabies-endemic countries between 2013 and 2016 and defined this as the rabies visit-risk sample. The first 850 respondents from the visit-risk sample who had undertaken pre-defined at-risk activities (e.g. contact with animals during the trip) completed an additional 15-min online questionnaire and were included in the activity-risk subsample. We also interviewed travel clinic personnel using a 25-min online or phone questionnaire.ResultsThe visit-risk sample included 4678 individuals. Many sought pre-travel health information online (33%) or talked to a family doctor (24%). Within the activity-risk subsample, 83% of travellers were aware of at least a few basic facts about rabies, and 84% could identify at least one correct rabies prevention measure; 49% were aware of a rabies vaccine, however, only 8% reported receiving PrEP vaccination within the past 3 years. Among 180 travel clinic respondents, 21% reported recommending PrEP against rabies to all travellers to rabies-endemic countries. Travel clinics estimated that 81% of travellers complete their travel vaccination schedules and reported sending reminders by e-mails (38%), text (38%), phone calls (37%) or by using vaccination cards (37%).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that although travellers had frequently heard of rabies, awareness of the risks of this serious infectious disease was relatively low.

Prevention of human rabies: a challenge for the European Union and the European Economic Area

“…This slight increase is not considered to reflect a change in the risk for travellers as there is no indication of a recent increase of the incidence of rabies in the reported countries of infection. However, we believe that the four cases reported in 2019 may highlight a lack of awareness among EU/EEA travellers, as it has been described by Marano et al [23]. Based on reported data there are two groups of individuals potentially at higher risk of being exposed and/ or contracting the disease: first, people who handle puppies and kittens and do not consider it a risk of exposure; second, people who are bitten/scratched by dogs or cats but do not seek medical attention.…”

Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation

“…A lack of concern about the associated illnesses was the most frequently mentioned reason to refuse the vaccines. More specifically, Marano et al assessed rabies risk perception among individuals who travelled to rabies-endemic countries [23]. Within the subsample of travellers at higher risk for rabies, a large part (83%) was aware of the basic characteristics of rabies.…”

COVID-19 in comparison with other emerging viral diseases: risk of geographic spread via travel

“…The Zaire species of Ebola kills somewhere between 40 to 90% of its victims, and usually upwards of 60% of infected people die [30]. Only a handful of infectious diseases can claim such high death rates, including rabies [31,32], pneumonic plague, and inhalational anthrax [33]. About 14,000 deaths due to Ebola were recorded in 2014.…”