Perceptions of police misconduct in Taiwan: does procedural justice matter?

Lai, Yung‐Lien; Chu, Doris C.; Wu, Szu-Chien; Luo, Fei; Lo, Tzu-Ying

doi:10.1080/0735648x.2022.2048053

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, their compromise is influenced by fairness in the management of retrieved volumes of data by the police from the surveillance cameras. This finding resonates with those conducted by Lai et al (2022), P osch (2020) and Saulnier and Sivasubramaniam (2021). Second, the study results established that POP-L has a positive effect on community well-being.…”

Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Also, Pósch (2020) established a significant mediating role of procedural justice between police legitimacy and social identity. Finally, Lai et al (2022) establish a significant mediating effect of procedural justice between media trust, victimization and involuntary contact with police. Based on these findings, the current study hypothesized that (Figure 1):…”

Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perceptions of police use of surveillance cameras in Ghana; does procedural justice matter?

Hevi

Malcalm

Ketemepi

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of perception of police use of surveillance cameras (POP-S), perception of police legitimacy (POP-L) and community well-being. The study further explores the mediating effect of procedural justice between POP-S and police legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach A convenience sampling technique was used in the selection of 388 participants, who answered questions relating to police use of surveillance cameras, legitimacy, procedural justice and community well-being. Structural equation modeling was used to test the effects of the hypothesized paths. Findings The findings showed that POP-L was positively related to community well-being. In addition, procedural fairness partially mediates between POP-S and police legitimacy. Research limitations/implications The study sample was limited to only motorists within the city of Accra. Hence, the study does not consider other potential offenses that may be uncovered by police-deployed surveillance cameras. Practical implications The study optimizes the relevance of technology use in contemporary policing for the elimination of road traffic carnage. Originality/value In this research, the academic scope of technology-based policing was scholarly advanced by drawing links between police use of surveillance cameras, police legitimacy, procedural justice and community well-being within the context of emerging economies.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of police use of surveillance cameras in Ghana; does procedural justice matter?

Hevi

Malcalm

Ketemepi

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Activity on Glasses as A Corruption Monitoring System

Bawono

2023

J. of Law and Sust. Develop.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The pursuit of a sustainable anti-corruption legal framework and its effective implementation, along with its enforcement instruments has run into impediments and constraints. These difficulties are made clear by the ongoing existence of corruption as an ailment infecting democracy. The main objective of this study is to reveal innovative ideas aimed at developing a system capable of preventing and eradicating corrupt practices. Methods: This study is based on Lawrance M. Friedman's legal system theory and legal protection theory. The objective is to construct a supervisory mechanism employing cutting-edge digital technology. This study employed an empirical legal nature, particularly descriptive-analytical study, which was later subjected to qualitative data analysis methods. Results: One of the initiatives to restore the credibility of anti-corruption measures is carried out through an activity monitoring system known as ‘activity on glasses.’ This method is an indispensable instrument for restoring a morally based legal enforcement system, which is appropriately referred to as the construction of a humanistic legal enforcement infrastructure employing digital media in the era of Industry 5.0. The ‘activity on glasses’ method goes beyond conventional supervision, aiming to develop a humanistic legal enforcement system. Furthermore, it serves as a means for the restoration of state officials' moral principles through a culture of accountability, allowing the detection of corrupt practices. Conclusion: The novelty of this study focuses on the imperative need for a supervisory framework known as ‘activity on glasses.’ It serves as a means for monitoring performance, moral conduct, and wealth held by public officials, with the goal of reducing cases of corruption and preventing their recurrence in the future.

show abstract

Perceptions of police misconduct in Taiwan: does procedural justice matter?

Cited by 2 publications

References 48 publications

Perceptions of police use of surveillance cameras in Ghana; does procedural justice matter?

Perceptions of police use of surveillance cameras in Ghana; does procedural justice matter?

Activity on Glasses as A Corruption Monitoring System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About