Perceptions of peer mental health: impact of race and student-athlete status

Tran, Alisia G. T. T.; Eustice, Kristi; Mintert, Jeffrey S.; Lam, Christina K.; Holzapfel, Jenny

doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1903477

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The included research articles were classified into five mutually exclusive primary focus areas during the data extraction phase: (1) access to and participation in sports , (2) access to SEM care , (3) health-related outcomes in SEM , (4) study methodology and (5) provider representation in SEM (table 1, online supplemental table S4). Most included studies were related to access to and participation in sports (n=45, 44%),17–61 followed by access to SEM care (n=28, 27%),62–89 health-related outcomes in SEM (n=24, 23%),90–113 provider representation in SEM (n=5, 5%)114–118 and methodology (n=1, 1%) 119…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 24 articles identified in the health-related outcomes in sports medicine domain, race/ethnicity was the dominant potential cause of health disparities identified (n=20 articles, figure 3C). 86 90–93 95 97–99 101 103–108 110–113 Other causes such as ability (both physical94 and intellectual,96 education level,103 location, language, nationality, gender identity and sexual orientation) were under-represented in this domain, with one article or no articles identified. Health-related outcomes assessed in this set of manuscripts included athlete survival/mortality, mental health and quality of life, sports-related injury, health literacy and incidence and symptoms of sports-related concussion.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Kliethermes,

Asif,

Blauwet

et al. 2024

Br J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveHealth disparities are widely prevalent; however, little has been done to examine and address their causes and effects in sports and exercise medicine (SEM). We aimed to summarise the focus areas and methodology used for existing North American health disparity research in SEM and to identify gaps in the evidence base.DesignScoping review.Data sourcesSystematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.Eligibility criteriaFull-text, peer-reviewed manuscripts of primary research, conducted in North America; published in the year 2000 or after, in English; and focusing on organised sports were included.Results103 articles met inclusion criteria. Articles were classified into five focus areas: access to and participation in sports (n=45), access to SEM care (n=28), health-related outcomes in SEM (n=24), provider representation in SEM (n=5) and methodology (n=1). Race/ethnicity (n=39), socioeconomic status (n=28) and sex (n=27) were the most studied potential causes of health disparities, whereas sexual orientation (n=5), location (rural/urban/suburban, n=5), education level (n=5), body composition (n=5), gender identity (n=4) and language (n=2) were the least studied. Most articles (n=74) were cross-sectional, conducted on youth (n=55) and originated in the USA (n=90).ConclusionHealth disparity research relevant to SEM in North America is limited. The overall volume and breadth of research required to identify patterns in a heterogeneous sports landscape, which can then be used to inform positive change, need expansion. Intentional research focused on assessing the intersectionality, causes and consequences of health disparities in SEM is necessary.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Kliethermes,

Asif,

Blauwet

et al. 2024

Br J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Participants included university students drawn from a larger research project comprised of online surveying and on-campus laboratory-based procedures at a large, Southwestern, public Pac-12/NCAA Division I university. This study represents the first publication using Implicit Association Test (IAT) data and participants’ corresponding online data from this project Tran, Eustice, et al (2021) and Tran, Holzapfel, et al (2021) exclusively used the online survey data drawn from a larger sample]. Participants were recruited in Fall 2016 and Spring 2017 to participate in an Arizona State University institutional review board-approved study via in-person course announcements, email, listservs, newsletters, bulletins, school website advertisements, and word-of-mouth.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foul play: Implicit and explicit attitudes toward student-athletes.

Tran,

Eustice,

Lam

et al. 2024

Journal of Diversity in Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students

Wood

Sealy

et al. 2022

Journal of American College Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic is having profound effects on college students. Students with mental health conditions are more vulnerable to the impact of stress, as it can exacerbate mental health symptoms. In order to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students' mental health, 773 students completed the survey and 489 were included in the final analysis.Participants were mostly female, undergraduate, and aged 18-25. Approximately 81.6 % selfreported at least one negative mental health symptom. Students reported increased feelings of hopelessness (+7.8%), loneliness (+6.7%), sadness (+8.8%), depression (+2.6%), anxiety (+5.2%), and anger (+14.6%) during COVID-19 than before. LGBTQ students and Black students had significantly more mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with straight and White students. Results of this study highlight the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant changes on college students' mental health.

show abstract

Perceptions of peer mental health: impact of race and student-athlete status

Cited by 3 publications

References 56 publications

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Foul play: Implicit and explicit attitudes toward student-athletes.

Mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About