2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00318-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of relation of stimuli locations successively flashed before saccade

Abstract: Based on localization error for a single perisaccadic flash, eye position signal is supposed to change more slowly than physical eye position. Nevertheless, a flicker is not perceived as moving in accordance with localization error for a single flash. We carried out two experiments to investigate this problem. Experiment 1 examined how a single flash or a flicker presented before saccade was perceived. The results showed that the flicker was not perceived as moving, although mislocalization for the single flas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the model, it was assumed that *Correspondence: msuzuki@kinjo-u.ac.jp the CD signal encoding an intended eye position between fixations is both anticipatory and damped, leading to an N-shaped timecourse as a whole, beginning to move long before saccade onset but lagging behind the eye movement after the mid portion of the saccadic periods. This model has been supported by subsequent researchers [10][11][12][13][14] . However, the pattern of the signal was still hypothetical, since the model was elaborated to replicate the pattern of mislocalization of stationary stimuli presented during the course of movements.…”
Section: Visual Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the model, it was assumed that *Correspondence: msuzuki@kinjo-u.ac.jp the CD signal encoding an intended eye position between fixations is both anticipatory and damped, leading to an N-shaped timecourse as a whole, beginning to move long before saccade onset but lagging behind the eye movement after the mid portion of the saccadic periods. This model has been supported by subsequent researchers [10][11][12][13][14] . However, the pattern of the signal was still hypothetical, since the model was elaborated to replicate the pattern of mislocalization of stationary stimuli presented during the course of movements.…”
Section: Visual Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…People, even naïve viewers, can recognize 3-5 characters in one saccade eye movement. One interesting feature of the perceived image that has been reported is that when a light stimulus is presented through a saccade, the width of the perceived image is only half of the retinal image, the width of which is saccade amplitude, as in Figure 1(b) (Hershberger, 1987;Hershberger & Jordan, 1992;Jordan & Hershberger, 1994;Hershberger, Jordan, & Lucas, 1998;Sogo & Osaka, 2001;Noritake, Kanzai, Terao, & Yagi, 2005;Watanabe, Maeda, & Tachi, 2005a;Watanabe, Noritake, Maeda, Tachi, & Nishida, 2005b). When 20°saccades occur, images 10°in width can be perceived.…”
Section: Features Of the Perisaccadically Presented Imagementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another approach is to not physically move a dot array, but instead change the blinking pattern of an array of lights at high speed. Then when the human does a saccade (high-speed eyeball movement), a 2D image is perceived [2][3] [4]. Such an information display method [which we call a saccade-based display ( Fig.…”
Section: Saccade-based Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%