Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants: is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language?

Klieve, Sharon; Jeanes, RC

doi:10.1002/dei.92

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified nine assessment tools: PROP, PVSP, PEPS-C, Perception of Prosody Assessment Tool (PPAT; Klieve, 1998), Minnesota Tests of Affective Processing (MNTAP; Lai, Hughes, & Shapiro, 1991), DANVA 2, Aprosodia Battery (Ross, Thompson, & Yenkoshy, 1997), Florida Affect Battery (FAB; Bowers, Blonder, & Heilman, 1999), and Advanced Clinical Solutions (ACS; Pearson, 2009). We are not aware of any additional batteries that assess prosody.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Martinez-Castilla, Sotillo, and Campos (2011) used the Spanish version of the PEPS-C (Peppé et al, 2010) to assess the prosodic abilities of Spanish-speaking adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome. The PPAT and MNTAP have been used to assess prosodic impairments in children with hearing loss and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Klieve & Jeanes, 2001;Shapiro, Hughes, August, & Bloomquist, 1993). The Aprosodia Battery, FAB, and ACS have been used mainly to assess affective prosodic difficulties in adults with conditions such as brain injury and neurologic and psychiatric disorders.…”

Section: Intended Purpose and Target Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indexical information is information that is related to the age, identity, and gender of the speaker (Paul, Augustyn, Klin, & Volkmar, 2005;Romero-Trillo & Newell, 2012;Stojanovik, 2010). The grammatical functions of prosody include (a) determining the boundaries of phrases, clauses, or sentences, particularly when there is ambiguity (e.g., /FRUIT, SALAD and MILK/ vs. /FRUIT-SALAD and MILK/; Wells & Peppé, 2003) and (b) differentiating between word classes when there are homonyms (e.g., a noun and verb that sound the same but are differentiated by prosody; greenhouse vs. green house; Klieve & Jeanes, 2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Behavioral Measures to Evaluate Prosodic Skills: A Review of Assessment Tools for Children and Adults

Kalathottukaren¹,

Purdy²,

McCormick³

et al. 2015

CICSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aims of this review were to identify and describe the assessment tools that have been developed to assess prosodic skills in children and adults and to evaluate the clinical utility of the tools. Method: Currently available tools were identified through searching 4 online databases and bibliographies of relevant articles and by contacting authors. Results: Nine assessment tools were identified. The tools were appraised for their intended purpose, target population, domains of prosody assessed, validity, reliability, and normative sample data. The purpose of development and the content of the tools were well O

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intended Purpose and Target Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Behavioral Measures to Evaluate Prosodic Skills: A Review of Assessment Tools for Children and Adults

Kalathottukaren¹,

Purdy²,

McCormick³

et al. 2015

CICSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prosody signals communicative and pragmatic intent, including attitude, emotion, irony, sincerity, uncertainty, and emphasis. CI users have been shown to have difficulty in auditorily perceiving intent and/or emotion in sentences, but seem able to make gains through instructional attention to prosodic cues (Klieve & Jeanes, 2001). Prosody also plays grammatical and semantic roles, particularly at the word level where pauses signal clause structure and syllabic stress distinguishes meaning in words/word groups that have variant pronunciations, such as "record" or highchair vs. high chair (Crystal, 1979).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2009

TVR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value Added: The Volta Review MonographsOver its 110-year history, The Volta Review has served as a primary source for the latest in cutting-edge research, professional commentary, and reviews of materials and technology that explore a listening and spoken language outcome for individuals with hearing loss. Keeping its readership informed is an important goal of The Volta Review and we continue to improve on that mission.In addition to the regular serial issues, The Volta Review is best known for its outstanding monographs focused on important or emerging issues in the area of listening and spoken language development of individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing. Monograph issues provide in-depth information that often cannot be obtained from any other single source. Each monograph is highly regarded and used as a springboard for further research and the development of guidelines and policies for listening and spoken language intervention. Past topics have included early hearing detection and intervention, mechanisms of aminoglycoside otoxicity and strategies for prevention, children with hearing loss and special needs, assessment of hearing in infants and toddlers, speech and language benefits of cochlear implantation, classroom acoustics, and language, speech, and socio-emotional development of children who are deaf or hard of hearing.In keeping with the cutting-edge nature of previous The Volta Review monographs, the next monograph edition will focus on the important issue of professional development in the field of listening and spoken language. Edited by Drs. Todd Houston and Christina Perigoe, this monograph will highlight models of professional preparation and development that have emerged in both pre-service and in-service training of listening and spoken language professionals who work with young children who are deaf or hard of hearing. The rapidly expanding AG Bell Academy for Listening and Spoken Language Specialist certifications -LSLS Cert. AVEd and LSLS Cert. AVThighlights the urgency of what is quickly becoming a "Crisis of Capacity" between the number of children seeking a listening and spoken language outcome and the number of qualified professionals to support them. This "must read" monograph will serve as an important guidepost for training the next generation of service providers. Look for it in June 2010.In addition, The Volta Review is pleased to announce that online archives of the journal are now available. Visit www.agbell.org/TheVoltaReview to view past archives up to 2006. Earlier issues will be posted as available.This issue contains some important research concerning speech, spoken language, and literacy skill development; decision-making tools for parents considering a second cochlear implant for their children; and commentary on speech-based language acquisition. We hope you enjoy this issue, and please don't hesitate to contribute to The Volta Review . Sincerely,This study examined the speech perception, speech, and language developmental progress of 25 children with hearing lo...

show abstract

“…Samuelsson (2011) conducted a 6-week evidence-based intervention for prosodic production difficulties in a child with language impairment and reported improved prosodic skills at word and phrasal levels. Klieve and Jeanes (2001) found that children using cochlear implants improved in perceiving prosodic cues in linguistic context after 10 weeks of intervention, suggesting that prosodic difficulties can be treated and hence assessment of prosodic difficulties is worthwhile.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Children with hearing loss aged 7-12 yr had significant difficulties in understanding different aspects of prosody and were rated as having more atypical prosody overall than controls. These findings suggest that clinical assessment and speech-language therapy services for children with hearing loss should be expanded to target prosodic difficulties. Future studies should investigate whether musical training is beneficial for improving receptive prosody skills.

show abstract

Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants: is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language?

Cited by 9 publications

References 5 publications

Behavioral Measures to Evaluate Prosodic Skills: A Review of Assessment Tools for Children and Adults

Behavioral Measures to Evaluate Prosodic Skills: A Review of Assessment Tools for Children and Adults

Untitled

Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About