2015
DOI: 10.1044/cicsd_42_s_138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Measures to Evaluate Prosodic Skills: A Review of Assessment Tools for Children and Adults

Abstract: The aims of this review were to identify and describe the assessment tools that have been developed to assess prosodic skills in children and adults and to evaluate the clinical utility of the tools. Method: Currently available tools were identified through searching 4 online databases and bibliographies of relevant articles and by contacting authors. Results: Nine assessment tools were identified. The tools were appraised for their intended purpose, target population, domains of prosody assessed, validity, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize, reliability tended to be highest for the Combined condition, and reliability was somewhat higher for the focus tests than for the phrase tests. Overall, however, these reliability scores compare favorably with those of other batteries of prosody perception ( Kalathottukaren et al , 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…To summarize, reliability tended to be highest for the Combined condition, and reliability was somewhat higher for the focus tests than for the phrase tests. Overall, however, these reliability scores compare favorably with those of other batteries of prosody perception ( Kalathottukaren et al , 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…To summarize, reliability tended to be highest for the both condition, and reliability was somewhat higher for the focus tests than for the phrase tests. Overall, however, these reliability scores compare favourably with those of other batteries of prosody perception (Kalathottukaren, Purdy, & Ballard, 2015).…”
Section: Subtest Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Six receptive subtests of the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (PEPS-C) (Wells et al, 2004) and the Child Paralanguage subtest of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy 2 (DANVA 2) (Nowicki and Duke, 1994) were used to evaluate receptive prosody in children. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency information for these assessments are provided in Kalathottukaren et al (2015a). Receptive subtests of PEPS-C were chosen, as it has options to assess grammatical (Turn-End and Chunking Reception), emotional (Affect Reception), and pragmatic (Contrastive Stress Reception) aspects of prosody.…”
Section: Test Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%