2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-9116-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of local people towards conservation of forest resources in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, north-western Himalaya, India

Abstract: This article examines the perception of the Bhotiya tribal community on the use and conservation of natural resources in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR), north-western Himalaya in India with an objective of identifying the bottlenecks in the sustainable management of forest resources of NDBR through people's participation. Despite, 85% of the respondents supporting the concept of conservation of forest resources, management decisions such as ban on mountaineering activities by creation of the Nanda Devi Na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with many previous studies [53,70] that have reported that a large proportion of local respondents support the establishment of nature reserves. However, many people remain who did not express their options about the establishment and management of the BNR and a few people expressed strong unsupportive attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in line with many previous studies [53,70] that have reported that a large proportion of local respondents support the establishment of nature reserves. However, many people remain who did not express their options about the establishment and management of the BNR and a few people expressed strong unsupportive attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Understanding the perceptions of local people as they relate to forest value is an important part of gaining a better understanding of major sources of conflict between those who want to emphasize community development and those in charge of nature reserve management [68]. Perceptions of forest value are a valuable source of information on local perspectives, knowledge, and beliefs [69,70]. Forest values play a critical role in identifying sustainable forest management goals, setting the context for decision-making, and guiding the choices of forest managers [71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, higher level of awareness on regulations can be associated to negative conservation attitudes (Heinen and Shrivastava 2009). The lack of involvement of the local community in the decision making processes and in forest management groups are also important determinants of negative attitudes toward protected areas (Silori 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits can be obtained through resource extraction, employment, development, or tourism (Allendorf 2007), but can also be noneconomic, such as recreation and aesthetics , Silori 2007. Local costs created by protected areas include human and wildlife conflicts, land pressure, loss of resources, and forfeited economic opportunities (Infield and Namara 2001, Heinen and Shrivastava 2009, Shibia 2010, and can determine overall negative attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, although the contribution of NTFPs was not large, it was very important, mostly for poorer households who directly or indirectly benefit from collection and trading (Dove 1993;Das 2005) and for those who were undoubtedly most vulnerable in this area. The scenario is not atypical in many other tropical developing countries, even in PAs where access to collect NTFPs has either been denied or is restricted to safeguard forest biodiversity (Hedge and Enters 2000; Ticktin et al 2002;Das 2005;Gubbi and MacMillan 2008), but the extent and distribution of benefits differ (Hedge and Enters 2000;Ambrose-Oji 2003) and not all people are keen to continue such a life if alternatives are provided or available (Badola 1998;Silori 2007). Arjunan et al (2005) and Gubbi and MacMillan (2008) concluded that NTFP harvesting is unlikely to generate positive conservation outcomes and/or economic upliftment in PAs, and legal recognition of local NTFP harvesting from PAs may have negative impact on biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%