Local Community Attitudes toward Forests Outside Protected Areas in India. Impact of Legal Awareness, Trust, and Participation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The success of long-term sustainable management of natural resources depends on local people's support. Assessing local people's attitudes, taking into account their needs, and respecting their opinions should become a management priority. In India, in the last 20 years, community needs and aspirations in forest management were handled through Joint Forest Management with varying degrees of success. Recently, the Forest Rights Act (2006) was passed to recognize and vest forest rights in forest dwelling communities. This major policy development is still in implementation, but little is known about how this devolution process will affect people's attitudes toward forests. In this paper, we analyze associations between attitudes toward state controlled forests (Reserved Forests) and (i) awareness about the Forest Right Act, (ii) attitudes toward the State Forest Department, and (iii) participation in forest management groups of mostly tribal forest dwellers in the district of Kodagu (Karnataka). We collected information with a structured questionnaire among 247 villagers living under three different land tenure and management regimes: (1) private coffee plantations, (2) Reserved Forest, and (3) National Park. The results of the multivariate analyses show that people are more likely to appreciate Reserved Forests if they have more knowledge about the Forest Rights Act and if they have positive attitudes toward the State Forest Department. A sobering result in our sample is that participation in formal forest management groups is negatively associated to attitudes toward Reserved Forests, suggesting the Joint Forest Management model doesn't necessarily help the transition from coercion to consent. Increasing local people awareness about their rights and improving their relations with the formal forest stewards remain priorities for sustainable forest management to emerge in India.

The Multiple Dimensions of Rural Forests: Lessons from a Comparative Analysis

“…Here, privately-owned agroforests and commonly-managed sacred forests coexist with reserved forests transferred to local people under Joint Forestry Management schemes defined by forestry services (Hinnewinkel et al 2008, Macura et al 2011). Due to the high diversity found in this region, the analysis distinguished two situations -agroforests and reserved forests -as two separate case studies.…”

Dynamics and determinants of land change in India: integrating satellite data with village socioeconomics

“…S22, S24-S26). Tribes are culturally linked to forests, and they are typically motivated by state forest department to jointly manage forest through protection, restoration of degraded forest, and enrichment plantations (World Bank 2005; Government of India 2007; Macura et al 2011) (notable exception of North-East India where tribes practice shifting cultivation). Sacred groves are typically protected by local community due to cultural/religious beliefs (Ormsby and Bhagwat 2010;Bhagwat et al 2014).…”

Conservation Status of Dilifekar Block, Arsi Mountains National Park, Ethiopia

“…In contrast, 11.9% of respondents reported as the Park has no any benefit from the wildlife and conservation activities. [14] Reported negative attitudes of local communities towards conservation of National Parks due to reasons of loss of job opportunities, proximity of community settlement and related factors. Some communities have less awareness towards protection of the area by comparing the pervious benefits before the Block establishment.…”