1999
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of coherent motion in random dot displays by pigeons and humans

Abstract: Pigeons and humans were required to discriminate coherent from random motion in dynamic random dot displays. Coherence and velocity thresholds were determined for both species, and both thresholds were found to be substantially higher for pigeons than for humans. The results are discussed with reference to differences in motion processing in mammals and birds. It is suggested that the inferior motion sensitivity of pigeons can be attributed to poorer spatiotemporal motion integration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
56
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests they were not processing the sequential order of the information within a video, and perhaps not even seeing them as coherent presentations of the real world. Pigeons appear to have a higher threshold for distinguishing coherent from random motion (Bischof et al, 1999) and this may have played a role in limiting their capabilities to distinguish the different modes of video presentation tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding suggests they were not processing the sequential order of the information within a video, and perhaps not even seeing them as coherent presentations of the real world. Pigeons appear to have a higher threshold for distinguishing coherent from random motion (Bischof et al, 1999) and this may have played a role in limiting their capabilities to distinguish the different modes of video presentation tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experimental chambers were modified pigeon operant chambers with touch screens inserted into one end of each chamber (for more details, see Bischof et al, 1999). Each touch screen was an infrared touch frame (Carroll Touch 1472) attached to a color monitor, with a thin sheet of Plexiglas inserted between the frame and the monitor.…”
Section: Behavioral Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both tasks, a two-alternative forcedchoice paradigm was used. For all birds, the motion task required detection of coherently moving random dots embedded in dynamic noise (Bischof et al, 1999) (Fig. 1 B).…”
Section: Behavioral Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations