2007
DOI: 10.3917/th.701.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception et anticipation du comportement d'autrui en situation simulée de conduite automobile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be considered as the perception and understanding of a situation and of any changes which might occur in light of the action. More recently, collective dimensions of driving have been highlighted whereby managing the risk of a collision is considered to require the interaction of several individual actions within certain time constraints [4].…”
Section: Driving a Motor Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be considered as the perception and understanding of a situation and of any changes which might occur in light of the action. More recently, collective dimensions of driving have been highlighted whereby managing the risk of a collision is considered to require the interaction of several individual actions within certain time constraints [4].…”
Section: Driving a Motor Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Granié et Espiau, 2010). Ces catégorisations sociales permettront une classification des comportements observés qui facilitera l'anticipation des comportements des autres usagers, en fonction de la situation, de leurs rôles dans l'espace urbain, et affinée par la prise en compte de leur appartenance à un certain groupe social (Mundutéguy et Darses, 2007). De ce fait, les attentes concernant autrui ne sont pas basées sur les normes institutionnelles, mais bien sur les normes sociales correspondant à son groupe d'appartenance.…”
Section: Anticiper Le Comportement D'autruiunclassified
“…On the other hand, processing knowledge is costly and this mental effort will be rather high, if concentrated on a short time period: dealing with high-level uncertainty in a very STA situation is highly costly. Accumulated knowledge, experience, and mature thinking might enable one to make a long-term projection on a next-to-deterministic basis, i.e., with a very low risk of failure, while a short-term projection requires skills and ability to act swiftly and adequately in often unpredictable and extraordinary situations (Michon 1985;Friedman 1990;Amalberti 1995;Cellier 1996;Denecker 1999;Hoc, Amalberti, and Plee 2000;Munduteguy and Darses 2007;Kaddoussi et al 2011;Lini et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Amalberti 1995;Denecker 1999;Munduteguy and Darses 2007;Kaddoussi et al 2011;Lini et al 2012), with an objective to show how human factor could be effectively quantified using probabilistic predictive modelling (PPM) technique. We do not intend to come up in this analysis with a perfect, complete, accurate, ready-to-go, 'off-the-shelf' type methodology, in which all the i's are dotted and all the t's are crossed, but rather want to demonstrate that an attempt to quantify the role of a human factor in safety-in-the-air situations is not hopeless at all, and that the well-established methods of the probabilistic risk analysis, including PPM approach, can be successfully employed in such an effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation