2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-9382(02)00054-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception aspects on perspective aircraft displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Rdey, Cochran, and Ballard (1982) manipulated an investigation of preferred shapes for warning labels and showed that the equilateral triangle pointing upward, diamond, octagon, and hexagon had higher preference scores than those for the other shapes tested. However, more recently, Andersson and Alm (2003) argued that shape is not good enough to distinguish among target categories. A sphere and one other symbol shape can be distinguished well, but when more shapes are used, the risk of confusion tends to be overwhelming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Rdey, Cochran, and Ballard (1982) manipulated an investigation of preferred shapes for warning labels and showed that the equilateral triangle pointing upward, diamond, octagon, and hexagon had higher preference scores than those for the other shapes tested. However, more recently, Andersson and Alm (2003) argued that shape is not good enough to distinguish among target categories. A sphere and one other symbol shape can be distinguished well, but when more shapes are used, the risk of confusion tends to be overwhelming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) studies have been conducted (Andersson & Alm, 2002, 2003, Lif, Kylesten, Lindahl & Hedström, 2005 which support that 2D is good for tasks involving metric judgments (often focused attention) and 3D is good to gain overall situation awareness, SA (intergrated). SA is generated over time and is an important part of dynamic decisionmaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experiments reported here are further described in Andersson and Alm (2002) EXPERIMENT 1 -SYMBOL RECOGNITION AND…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%