2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception and practice of sublingual immunotherapy among practicing allergists in the United States: a follow-up survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method is associated with several problems, such as inconvenience, invasiveness, and moderate-to-severe adverse effects [1]. Thus, there is a growing interest in sublingual administration as an effective alternative [1,2]. One of the advantages of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is that, as an oral drug, it can be administered at home.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this method is associated with several problems, such as inconvenience, invasiveness, and moderate-to-severe adverse effects [1]. Thus, there is a growing interest in sublingual administration as an effective alternative [1,2]. One of the advantages of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is that, as an oral drug, it can be administered at home.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Three sublingual tablets have been approved in the USA: Oralair, a mixture of five northern pasture grasses; Grastek, which contains Timothy grass; and Ragwitek, which contains ragweed. Although many allergy patients are polysensitized in the USA, the possibility of a dust mite sublingual tablet becoming available, perhaps as early as 2015, could lead to a significant change in the way that many allergists prescribe AIT [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiallergen SLIT in the United States has not been approved and there is no reimbursement code for this modality. Even so, SCIT extracts are used off-label to prepare liquid SLIT formulations by some allergists and by almost one-third of ENT physicians [9][10][11]. Care should be taken in such practices, as dual allergen liquid SLIT with two nonrelated allergens has been shown to be effective [7 && ,12], but SLIT with ten allergens mixed in one vial was not [8 && ].…”
Section: Issues a Comments Based On Past And Recent Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%