Percepción de innovación en las organizaciones. Percepción de innovación en organizaciones de España y Latinoamérica

Abstract

Se indaga sobre la percepción de factores de la innovación en muestras de expertos y trabajadores de España y Sudamérica, utilizando una escala construida a partir de la evidencia meta-analítica. Las personas participantes perciben que se dan de forma moderada los factores favorables a la creatividad, de rol, grupales, de liderazgo, de clima e individuales en las organizaciones, aunque no perciben que predominen los factores de estructura organizacional ni que las organizaciones enfaticen la creatividad aplicada o innovación. El nivel percibido de innovación organizacional se asoció a los factores anteriores, mostrando mayor relevancia los organizacionales y de rol laboral, que los de liderazgo, individuales y grupales, congruentemente con los metanálisis.
 
 This study examines the perception of factors of innovation in samples of experts and workers from Spain and South-America, using a scale based on meta-analytic evidence. Participants perceive that role, group, leadership, climate and psychological factors of innovations exist at a moderate level, while perceive that organizational structure of innovation are not present and than innovation is not emphasized. Perceived level of innovation was associated to these factors, organizational and role factors predicted innovation strongly than leadership, individual and group factors, congruently with meta-analysis

Belonging and Social Integration as Factors of Well-Being in Latin America and Latin Europe Organizations

“…Both instruments were only used with workers from Spain and Argentina. GHWB is measured through the socio-emotional climate dimension by da Costa et al (2016) (α = 0.86), along with the dimension of cohesion as a group process (α = 0.88) from the same instrument for both samples ( r = 0.75). A Likert scale with 7 anchor points is used (not applicable at all = 1 to 7 = highly applicable).…”

“…Cronbach’s α: 0.69 (OVC) and 0.71 (self-transcendence: TVB and TVU). KPW is measured with 4 items ( da Costa et al, 2016 ) using a dichotomous scale (1 = no, 2 = yes). Spearman Brown: 0.70.…”

“…Spearman Brown: 0.70. IPaCG, as well as TOaCE, are respectively evaluated with 3 items from group processes ( da Costa et al, 2016 ) and 7 anchor points (not applicable at all = 1 to 7 = highly applicable). Cronbach’s α: 0.84 and 0.86.…”

“…Cronbach’s α: 0.84 and 0.86. LR is measured with 6 items and 7 anchor points ( da Costa et al, 2016 ). Cronbach’s α: 0.85 (complexity and challenge of the role) and 0.62 (autonomy) r = 0.69.…”

“…Cronbach’s α: 0.87. CSO is measured with 7 items and 7 anchor points ( da Costa et al, 2016 ). Cronbach’s α: 0.88 (organizational integration) and 0.81 (resources) r = 0.74, Cronbach’s α: 0.90.…”