Abstract:People make judgments of others based on appearance, and these inferences can affect social interactions. Although the importance of facial appearance in these judgments is well established, the impact of the body morphology remains unclear. Specifically, it is unknown whether experimentally varied body morphology has an impact on perception of threat in others. In two preregistered experiments (N = 250), participants made judgments of perceived threat of body stimuli of varying morphology, both in the absence… Show more
“…This aligns with earlier research that suggests that inherently threatening or negative stimuli are likely to be recalled more accurately than neutral or positive stimuli (e.g., Mattarozzi et al, 2015;Mealey et al, 1996;Oda, 1997;Rule et al, 2012). Thus, it may be in Experiment 1 that the most muscular bodies were recalled with the highest accuracy because they appeared more threatening, consistent with our manipulation check and earlier work (McElvaney et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results suggest that, as per the CMEI prediction, the suspect was perceived and later recalled in a biased fashion to match the appearance of a stereotypically threatening criminal. Indeed, perceived threat in computer-generated (CG) body stimuli has previously been shown to increase linearly with increases in musculature (McElvaney et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: The Cmei Perceived Threat and Criminalitymentioning
To date, it is still unclear whether there is a systematic pattern in the errors made in eyewitness recall and whether certain features of a person are more likely to lead to false identification. Moreover, we also do not know the extent of systematic errors impacting identification of a person from their body rather than solely their face. To address this, based on the contextual model of eyewitness identification (CMEI; Osborne & Davies, 2014, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28[3], 392–402), we hypothesized that having framed a target as a perpetrator of a violent crime, participants would recall that target person as appearing more like a stereotypical criminal (i.e., more threatening). In three separate experiments, participants were first presented with either no frame, a neutral frame, or a criminal frame (perpetrators of a violent crime) accompanying a target (either a face or body). Participants were then asked to identify the original target from a selection of people that varied in facial threat or body musculature. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no evidence of bias. However, identification accuracy was highest for the most threatening target bodies high in musculature, as well as bodies paired with detailed neutral contextual information. Overall, these findings suggest that while no systematic bias exists in the recall of criminal bodies, the nature of the body itself and the context in which it is presented can significantly impact identification accuracy.
“…This aligns with earlier research that suggests that inherently threatening or negative stimuli are likely to be recalled more accurately than neutral or positive stimuli (e.g., Mattarozzi et al, 2015;Mealey et al, 1996;Oda, 1997;Rule et al, 2012). Thus, it may be in Experiment 1 that the most muscular bodies were recalled with the highest accuracy because they appeared more threatening, consistent with our manipulation check and earlier work (McElvaney et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results suggest that, as per the CMEI prediction, the suspect was perceived and later recalled in a biased fashion to match the appearance of a stereotypically threatening criminal. Indeed, perceived threat in computer-generated (CG) body stimuli has previously been shown to increase linearly with increases in musculature (McElvaney et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: The Cmei Perceived Threat and Criminalitymentioning
To date, it is still unclear whether there is a systematic pattern in the errors made in eyewitness recall and whether certain features of a person are more likely to lead to false identification. Moreover, we also do not know the extent of systematic errors impacting identification of a person from their body rather than solely their face. To address this, based on the contextual model of eyewitness identification (CMEI; Osborne & Davies, 2014, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28[3], 392–402), we hypothesized that having framed a target as a perpetrator of a violent crime, participants would recall that target person as appearing more like a stereotypical criminal (i.e., more threatening). In three separate experiments, participants were first presented with either no frame, a neutral frame, or a criminal frame (perpetrators of a violent crime) accompanying a target (either a face or body). Participants were then asked to identify the original target from a selection of people that varied in facial threat or body musculature. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no evidence of bias. However, identification accuracy was highest for the most threatening target bodies high in musculature, as well as bodies paired with detailed neutral contextual information. Overall, these findings suggest that while no systematic bias exists in the recall of criminal bodies, the nature of the body itself and the context in which it is presented can significantly impact identification accuracy.
“…This signal value could reflect a specific connotation of a body as appearing emaciated. Men with less body mass overall could be seen as particularly nonthreatening (McElvaney et al, 2021). The lack of body mass for this particular target could have connoted a lack of overall social capital to a perceiver, thus fostering a perception of an interest in using self-defeating humor for its ingratiation function.…”
“…Adiposity from reduced testosterone levels would conversely implicate high-fat men as non-aggressive, resulting in perceptions of such men exhibiting warmth (Gray et al, 2012;Sacco et al, 2020). Emaciation is further perceived as a nonthreatening morphology in men (McElvaney et al, 2021).…”
Men’s formidability is inferred multimodally through various facial and bodily features. Such inferences frequently provide downstream perceptions of various traits and motivational states that inform subsequent affiliative decisions. Within these inferences could be an implicit understanding of men’s preferred humor styles. Across four studies, this research considered perceptions of men’s proclivity to employ each of the four humor styles through different formidability cues: upper body strength (Study 1), body muscularity (Study 2), facial width-to-height ratio (Study 3), and neck musculature (Study 4). Results indicated a relatively consistent perception of formidable features being diagnostic of men’s interest in aggressive humor. Additional findings indicate certain formidability cues connote a disinterest in self-defeating and self-enhancing humor. Facial and bodily cues finally connoted affiliative humor in different capacities. We frame findings from an evolutionary perspective based on perceptions of the various benefits and costs of different formidability features.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.