2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariation between formidability inferences and perceptions of men's preferred humor styles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(106 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings encourage an interesting discussion on perceptions of strong men as being more interested in promiscuous mating strategies and employing gregarious interpersonal (Schmitt & Shackelford, 2008), despite a concomitant perception of these men as aggressive. These results reflect the dual signal value of men's strength as connoting an affiliative opportunity and an increased physical threat if conflict were to arise (Brown et al, 2022c;Geniole & McCormick, 2013). Additionally, and also consonant with research reflecting an interest in monogamy among those exhibiting higher levels of these traits (Schmitt & Shackelford, 2008), affiliative targets were perceived as more agreeable and conscientious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings encourage an interesting discussion on perceptions of strong men as being more interested in promiscuous mating strategies and employing gregarious interpersonal (Schmitt & Shackelford, 2008), despite a concomitant perception of these men as aggressive. These results reflect the dual signal value of men's strength as connoting an affiliative opportunity and an increased physical threat if conflict were to arise (Brown et al, 2022c;Geniole & McCormick, 2013). Additionally, and also consonant with research reflecting an interest in monogamy among those exhibiting higher levels of these traits (Schmitt & Shackelford, 2008), affiliative targets were perceived as more agreeable and conscientious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The costs or benefits of strong men could be most salient with knowledge of their preferred humor style. Strong men are perceived as interested in employing both affiliative and aggressive humor (Brown et al, 2022c). These dual signal values suggest that additional context clues could foster different perceptions of strength.…”
Section: Desirability Of Humor Styles Across Mating Contextsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the use of aggressive humor appears particularly effective in increasing men’s perceived dominance ( Cowan and Little, 2013 ) because, if the Contests Hypothesis is correct, aggression—including verbal aggression and thus the use of aggressive humor—did not evolve to attract mates but to repel same-sex rivals. Consistent with this hypothesis, Brown et al (2022) found that men and women tended to perceive more physically formidable (e.g., muscular) men to be more likely to use aggressive humor. Physical formidability is a major determinant of men’s ability to inflict physical costs on others and thus their competitiveness in contest competitions ( Sell et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Strong men are perceived as protective parents and mates that could afford security against interpersonal threats (Brown, Donahoe, & Boykin, 2022;Brown, Sacco, & Drea, 2022;Snyder et al, 2011). However, several competing inferences could undermine this desirability, as masculinized features could connote aggressive and promiscuous intent (Brown & Sacco, 2017;Brown, Tracy, & Boykin, 2022;Gallup et al, 2007;Geniole & McCormick, 2013;. Strong men could be perceived as threatening to women due to the physical size asymmetry imposed by sexual dimorphism that could lead them to feel vulnerable to exploitation (Sell et al, 2012).…”
Section: Contextual Mate Value Of Men's Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%