2014
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1017a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Predicts Environmental Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
9
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The indirect influence on perceived vulnerability to disease and the concept level was confirmed in other studies (e.g. Gerrard, Gibbons, & Bushman, 1996;Prokop, & Kubiatko, 2014;Prokop, Usak, & Fancovicova, 2010;Timmermans et al, 2008). It can be assumed that people who have a perceived vulnerability to disease are more interested in diseases, in the origin of every disease, have more knowledge about bacteria and viruses and also about every possibility of being endangered by diseases in outside as well as also inside environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The indirect influence on perceived vulnerability to disease and the concept level was confirmed in other studies (e.g. Gerrard, Gibbons, & Bushman, 1996;Prokop, & Kubiatko, 2014;Prokop, Usak, & Fancovicova, 2010;Timmermans et al, 2008). It can be assumed that people who have a perceived vulnerability to disease are more interested in diseases, in the origin of every disease, have more knowledge about bacteria and viruses and also about every possibility of being endangered by diseases in outside as well as also inside environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This paradox suggests that some unknown factors beyond our measures influences gender differences in the attitude toward frogs. Perhaps greater environmental concerns found in females (Prokop & Kubiatko, 2014;Zelezny, Chua, & Aldrich, 2000) may at least partially explain this phenomenon. Another possibility is that females avoid touching frogs because they are more disgust sensitive which promotes avoidant behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One way to interpret gender differences may discuss the greater female concerns about environmental degradation. Females usually report a greater environmental concern and greater proenvironmental behavior than males (McMillan, Hoba, Clifford, & Brant, 1999;Shobeiri, Omidvar, & Prahallada, 2006;Prokop & Kubiatko, 2014;Zelezny, Chua, & Aldrich, 2000). Thus, they would express greater interest in animals, especially those that are endangered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%