2015
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.18.4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived vs. Actual Distance to Transit in Santiago, Chile

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the real route walked by the commuters, we can take advantage of the results of surveys. This way of data collection is not innovative and is commonly used (e.g., Daniels & Mulley 2013;El-Geneidy et al 2014;Hernández and Witter 2015), although the use of advanced information technology has become more and more up to date using both localization by mobile phones or data from social networks (Witlox 2015). The findings presented below were derived from a survey carried out between September 22-26, 2014, in Ostrava and Olomouc and surrounding municipalities serviced by urban public transport links.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the real route walked by the commuters, we can take advantage of the results of surveys. This way of data collection is not innovative and is commonly used (e.g., Daniels & Mulley 2013;El-Geneidy et al 2014;Hernández and Witter 2015), although the use of advanced information technology has become more and more up to date using both localization by mobile phones or data from social networks (Witlox 2015). The findings presented below were derived from a survey carried out between September 22-26, 2014, in Ostrava and Olomouc and surrounding municipalities serviced by urban public transport links.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the careful formation of the questions, informats' responses and distance decay functions may not truly reflect their actual propensity to walk. As studies show, people can have a biased perception about the true length of certain trips (Button et al, 2016;Hernández and Witter, 2015;Krizek et al, 2012;Lowrey, 1970;Säisä et al, 1986). It is also possible that their answers simply do not reflect the real willingness to walk, especially among people who predominantly use other transport modes, or that people were estimating actual distances to frequently used amenities and not whether they are prepared to actually overcome a reported distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived walking distance can vary for the actual distance [2]. Therefore, for walkability, walking distance is more appropriate if using pedestrian perceptions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these measures there is a focus on walking distance [1][2][3]. Distance to transit together with density, diversity, (street) design, and distance to destination are an urban form attributes known as 5 D's used when verify the effect of built environment on walking and cycling [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%