1983
DOI: 10.2307/3053589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Risk and Social Control: Do Sanctions Really Deter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
127
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They have for instance studied the effects of overconfidence (Dunning et al 1990;, hyperbolic discounting (Laibson 1997;Loughran et al 2012) and ambiguity aversion (Ellsberg 1961;Loughran et al 2011) on the decision to commit crime. This ties into older work on a self-serving bias in the estimated effect of sanctions (Nagin and Pogarsky 2003), the perceived fairness of sanctions (Piquero et al 2004), the motivating force of identity (Paternoster and Bushway 2008) and of morality (Paternoster and Simpson 1996;Brezina and Piquero 2007) and the ensuing disciplining effect of shaming (Rebellon et al 2010), as well as work on impulsivity Nagin and Pogarsky 2003), on the perception of the risk of sanctions (Paternoster et al 1983;Klepper and Nagin 1989;Nagin and Paternoster 1991) and on inter-individual differences (Nagin and Paternoster 1993;Nagin and Paternoster 1994;Piquero et al 2011;.…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…They have for instance studied the effects of overconfidence (Dunning et al 1990;, hyperbolic discounting (Laibson 1997;Loughran et al 2012) and ambiguity aversion (Ellsberg 1961;Loughran et al 2011) on the decision to commit crime. This ties into older work on a self-serving bias in the estimated effect of sanctions (Nagin and Pogarsky 2003), the perceived fairness of sanctions (Piquero et al 2004), the motivating force of identity (Paternoster and Bushway 2008) and of morality (Paternoster and Simpson 1996;Brezina and Piquero 2007) and the ensuing disciplining effect of shaming (Rebellon et al 2010), as well as work on impulsivity Nagin and Pogarsky 2003), on the perception of the risk of sanctions (Paternoster et al 1983;Klepper and Nagin 1989;Nagin and Paternoster 1991) and on inter-individual differences (Nagin and Paternoster 1993;Nagin and Paternoster 1994;Piquero et al 2011;.…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Whether the youth lives with both his natural parents, whether his mother was a teenager at birth, family income, and the presence of gangs in the neighborhood do not a ect an individual's reported beliefs about the probability of arrest. Of the individual characteristics other than race, only the e ects of Peabody Individual Achievement T est PIAT scores for math in percentiles, 17 are statistically signi cant, suggesting a positive relationship between the perceived probability o f arrest and math ability. Counter to an`ability to evade' arrest hypothesis, a 10 higher PIAT score is associated with a 1 higher perceived chance of arrest.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Blacks also believe that they face a lower probability of spending time in jail once arrested, while hispanics feel that they are more likely to be released without charge or with a ne if arrested. Individuals from families with a higher income consider themselves less likely to face nes or jail 17 Note that PIAT scores are only observed for individuals with less than 10 years of schooling nearly everyone age 16. To maintain the representativeness of the sample, all individuals age 16 are dropped from regressions including PIAT scores, making the sample representative of males ages 12-15. time if arrested.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Academic achievement in school is often considered an indicator of commitment to conformity in terms of both current peer acceptance and the recognition of future prospects (Paternoster, Saltzman, Waldo, and Chiricos, 1983). Undisciplined or deviant school behavior is more of a direct indicator of lack of normative commitment and involvement in unconventional activity.…”
Section: Social Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%