“…In a study with police officers, deception detection was improved when they focused on story-related cues, such as vagueness or contradictions, instead of nonverbal cues like posture change or fidgeting (Mann, Vrij, & Bull, 2004). Detection deception is also more accurate when judges are familiar with the situation described in the (truthful vs. deceptive) statement (Reinhard, Sporer, & Scharmach, 2015;Reinhard, Sporer, Scharmach, & Marksteiner, 2011). Similarly, judges provided with "content in context" cues, such as meaningful contextual information, reached an average of 75% detection accuracy (Blair, Levine, & Shaw, 2010).…”