2001
DOI: 10.1068/p3087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Depth of 3-D Objects in 3-D Scenes

Abstract: Effects of information specifying the position of an object in a 3-D scene were investigated in two experiments with twelve observers. To separate the effects of the change in scene position from the changes in the projection that occur with increased distance from the observer, the same projections were produced by simulating (a) a constant object at different scene positions and (b) different objects at the same scene position. The simulated scene consisted of a ground plane, a ceiling plane, and a cylinder … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study also showed that observers overestimated depth less with increasing physical depth. This latter finding is consistent with results reported by Sauer [2001] and confirms the conclusion of Gilinsky [1951] that perceived distance is a nonlinear function of physical distance. As shown in Figure 6, we found that the perceived depth is farther away from the stereoscopically presented depth at larger depth on both the stereoscope and the 3D TV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The present study also showed that observers overestimated depth less with increasing physical depth. This latter finding is consistent with results reported by Sauer [2001] and confirms the conclusion of Gilinsky [1951] that perceived distance is a nonlinear function of physical distance. As shown in Figure 6, we found that the perceived depth is farther away from the stereoscopically presented depth at larger depth on both the stereoscope and the 3D TV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In order to vary the velocity difference and velocity ratio independently, while keeping the simulated size and distance of the object constant, it was necessary to display objects that were both rotating and translating. To provide a context for the objects, and comparability to previous research (Sauer et al 2001), we embedded the objects in a scene consisting of a ground plane and a ceiling plane, with poles connecting the objects to these planes (see figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one word, eye-to-object distances have little value in shape perception when the viewing distances are large relative to the object depths. [11] As a matter of fact, this kind of optical illusion could also be found in our real world (see Fig. 3).…”
Section: Fig2 An Example House In Lod3 and Its Exterior Shellmentioning
confidence: 93%