2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived benefits and constraints in vehicle automation: Data to assess the relationship between driver's features and their attitudes towards autonomous vehicles

Abstract: This data article examines the association driver's features, perceptions and attitudes towards autonomous vehicles (AVs). The data was collected using a structured self-administrable and online-based questionnaire, applied to a full sample of 1205 Spanish drivers. The data contains 4 parts: the full set of bivariate correlations between study variables; descriptive statistics and graphical trends for each main study variable according to gender, age group and city/town size; and, finally, the dataset for furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on road vehicle automation have operationalized perceived safety and trust by generic items, such as: “Overall , AVs would help make my journeys safer than they are when I use conventional vehicles” [ 78 , p. 3; 79, p. 874], “I am worried that the general safety of using an AV is worse than that of driving a common vehicle” [ 80 , p. 109848], and “Overall , I can trust autonomous vehicles” [ 29 , p. 697]. Other studies asked respondents to rate their level of trust and safety or changes in these using items such as: “To what extent do you trust the driving automation according to the previous performance of the system ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on road vehicle automation have operationalized perceived safety and trust by generic items, such as: “Overall , AVs would help make my journeys safer than they are when I use conventional vehicles” [ 78 , p. 3; 79, p. 874], “I am worried that the general safety of using an AV is worse than that of driving a common vehicle” [ 80 , p. 109848], and “Overall , I can trust autonomous vehicles” [ 29 , p. 697]. Other studies asked respondents to rate their level of trust and safety or changes in these using items such as: “To what extent do you trust the driving automation according to the previous performance of the system ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature emphasizes that all three independent variables of the research are related to each other. For example, although perceived safety seems to describe the reduction of accidents [40] and therefore the increase in life safety [49] at first glance, potential accidents will have heavy costs that will force third parties such as maintenance and insurance [50]. Therefore, perceived security becomes indirectly related to the perception of advantage [9].…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 (H3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, the efficiency problem caused by the dimension of the take-over interaction interface is very important, especially now that the aging phenomenon is more and more serious. Research showed that drivers from different age groups had significant differences in perceived safety and intention to use of automated driving and the score increased with age [26].…”
Section: Cognitive and Behavioral Problems In The Process Of Take-mentioning
confidence: 99%