2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2007.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
106
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
106
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first hypothesis, the impact of EO, however not linked in the previous literature, has a positive and significant effect on ERP at 0.001 level of significant (β=0.585, t= 11.017, p<0.001). In consistence with previous findings of Bendoly and Kaefer (2004), Park, Suh, and Yang (2007), and Poston and Grabski (2001); the second hypothesis supported that ERP has a positive and significant effect on organizational performance at the 0.05 level of significant (β=0.147, t= 1.999, p<0.05). In addition, the third hypothesis also support the argument that EO has a positive and significant effect on organizational performance at 0.001 level of significant (β=0.547, t= 9.167, p<0.001) in line with many studies found that firms with more EO perform better (Wiklund, 1999;Zahra, 1991;Zahra & Covin, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first hypothesis, the impact of EO, however not linked in the previous literature, has a positive and significant effect on ERP at 0.001 level of significant (β=0.585, t= 11.017, p<0.001). In consistence with previous findings of Bendoly and Kaefer (2004), Park, Suh, and Yang (2007), and Poston and Grabski (2001); the second hypothesis supported that ERP has a positive and significant effect on organizational performance at the 0.05 level of significant (β=0.147, t= 1.999, p<0.05). In addition, the third hypothesis also support the argument that EO has a positive and significant effect on organizational performance at 0.001 level of significant (β=0.547, t= 9.167, p<0.001) in line with many studies found that firms with more EO perform better (Wiklund, 1999;Zahra, 1991;Zahra & Covin, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…They suggested more comprehension of the ERP-performance relationship that can be earned if researchers and managers test changes in the system and modular levels. In relation to that, Park, Suh, and Yang (2007) in their study investigated the effect of ERP systems on organizational performance in a Korean context by using data collected from 245 respondents in 20 Korean companies that have ERP systems. Their results stated that the users' knowledge and capacity play a direct and indirect effect on its value and finally impact positively on organizational performance.…”
Section: Enterprise Resource Planning (Erp) and Organizational Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected from the nature and the integration between variables, all hypotheses have been confirmed. In addition, in consistent with other previous studies, ERP has been found to have a positive and significant effect on organizational performance (β=0.579, t= 15.293, p<0.001) (Poston & Grabski, 2001;Park, Suh, & Yang, 2007). However, the effect of ERP on TQM and ERP on organizational excellence have not been linked before in the literature, it was found that they have positive and significant effect (β=0.841, t= 44.301, p<0.001) and (β=0.634, t= 15.337, p<0.001) respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This research is in accordance to the research by Park et al [33] which states the sharing knowledge will increase the understanding and usage of ERP comprehensively. This research also supports the research by Zang et al [31] which reveals the positive correlation between the proper data input as a good organizational culture and the implementation process of the ERP system.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%